Lol nothing says we are afraid of the working class like banning subreddits on suppressed news they don’t want us to see. I came here bc I got a warning on my account for liking a comment that said “Luigi”. My alt account got banned for sharing the DOGE email list that is public info. Fuck Reddit. I’m done.

  • xye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Why would they? Ineffectual protests with disparate, unclear goals. More useful to keep them so there’s at least a harmless resistance to redirect energy toward.

      • xye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I couldn’t find that immediately on their site but Wikipedia told me it’s:

        Which imo is an unrealistic bucket of goals, not a unified call to action

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 hours ago

          They may be unrealistic but that says more about this administration than it does about the protests. That’s pretty basic shit imo

          • xye@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Agreed. And I want groups like this to succeed. But we need a single, easily digestible message that can encompass all of these issues under one roof. That issue, imo, is wealth inequality. But now it all comes down to phrasing. It’s an issue that isn’t hard to get people on board with if, and only if, we are careful with messaging and branding. I wish I was joking, but that’s the world we live in. Not the one where I demand everything, get nothing, and keep being frustrated that it never changes. It’s time to adapt or continue the cycle of losing.

            • krashmo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 hours ago

              I don’t think phrasing is the problem. I think the problem is a lack of leaders willing to stand behind it. Democrats are trying to pander to rich people while simultaneously tapping into the anger at rich people and that just comes off as disingenuous at best. I think voters will turn out if we give them a reason to. I think Democrats know that too and that’s why they fight harder to stop progressives from gaining influence than they do to curb the existing influence of the rich.

        • aceshigh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          It sounds like they are against the current administration. These are all of the things that were negative impacted by them.

          • xye@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Ok but this is the problem I think occupy wall street had. They were protesting the right people, getting attention, but consistently the messaging was vaguely gestures the system, Wall Street, bankers. We can speculate why that messaging wasn’t clear or didn’t get out, but we have an opportunity right now to correct that mistake.

              • xye@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                Income inequality in whatever the most palatable form is for the target audience who needs to hear it. That’s it. But I’m clearly not convincing you here - I’m just some rando idiot who sees a problem. I would gladly have an adult in the room give a better answer. In lieu of that, this is the best I’ve got for you. I’d love to have a space to discuss these things, I think actionable items like this are missing from current discourse here. Maybe it’s the format idk