• letsgo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 hours ago

    What a guy. He shot to the top of my rankings that day three years ago when he said he needed ammo, not a ride. And unlike cowardly little shitbox hiding in his kremlin he’s not afraid of visiting the soldiers on the front line.

    If only all politicians put their country ahead of themselves like Zelensky does. What an amazing planet this could be.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hats off to one of the few remaining real politicians who put the country over their own person.

    On the other hand, if they would hold a vote for a new president after that, he surely would get the job again.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Very nice and clever response to the shitheads expecting meat-headed claims of “Zelensky dictator, no election, Russia rescue” to hold any water.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think the rest of NATO should eagerly take him up on his offer… sans the resignation. Because Ukraine needs Zelenskyy at this point.

    That alone would enrage Putin and his KGB puppet currently sitting in the Oval Office.

    And then the rest of NATO can go completely weapons-free at Russia and Belarus.

    • Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ukraine can’t join without being in active conflict with another country for a set amount of time.

      A rule, I might add, put in place to prevent exactly this scenario.

    • Uniformly9@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think if the US opposes Ukraine joining, then NATO will be de facto replaced by some European equivalent. So the question is, is the US - and specifically I mean the Trump regime - comfortable with that?

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nothing would really need to change, as if Ukraine was admitted to the EU defence agreement, that is a stronger binding agreement than NATO towards Europe.

        And if Russia attacks, and most of NATO is thus at war, the US will then do what the US would have always done either way, which I don’t know what it is at this point.

        • DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          I assume the US’ plan would involve blowing a bunch of shit up, making the situation significantly worse while achieving none of the objectives they originally intended to, and transferring a fuckton of cash to Lockheed Martin in the process.

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is not bargaining… It’s simply proving he isn’t a dictator

      • foenkyfjutschah@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        the red line that Russia saw crossed when it escalated the conflict (that the president had promised to pacify before his election with no negotiational success) into full-fledged war.