• zaphod@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    What’s the point of ceding part of your country for peace, if you get invaded again a few years later? That’s not peace.

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Seems like something that’s atleast worth the shot when the alternative is to continue with the ongoing war while losing more and more territory and soldiers each day. In order to prevent a war from happening again you first need to stop the war that’s already going on.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I feel like it might be a bit better to try to fight on until you have at least some security guarantees, so you know they just don’t attack you right after regrouping than let them disarm you in name of peace and then get fucked right after by their attack.

        Leaving yourself at the mercy of your attacker is the sort of lunacy you’d only have to resort to when you have no other choice.

        • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I don’t see how continuing the fight is going to lead to security guarantees for Ukraine. A peace deal or ceasefire could at least allow individual countries to send peacekeepers independently of NATO. There are ways to deter a future attack outside of full membership. And if a ceasefire ends up being just a chance to regroup, then at least Ukraine gets that chance as well. As we saw during Ukraine’s “counteroffensive,” well-fortified positions are extremely difficult and costly to break through.