SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 8 days agoBiblical Rulelemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up11.21Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.18Karrow-down1external-linkBiblical Rulelemmy.worldSoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 8 days agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-squaresuperkret@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up26arrow-down17·8 days agoHuman rights and dignity weren’t on the ballot, though.
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 days agoThey pretty clearly were. Choosing to ignore secondary effects of choices, or being willing to use suffering of vulnerable groups as a means to your end doesn’t change that.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down1·8 days agoWe got to choose who we would protest against. We chose poorly.
minus-squarepapertowels@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·8 days agoSure seems like it is if they removed all mention of trans folks from stonewall…
minus-squareSoulg@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·7 days agoMaybe but you had 10/10 denial of rights versus like 5/10 The choice was still obvious.
Human rights and dignity weren’t on the ballot, though.
They pretty clearly were. Choosing to ignore secondary effects of choices, or being willing to use suffering of vulnerable groups as a means to your end doesn’t change that.
We got to choose who we would protest against. We chose poorly.
Sure seems like it is if they removed all mention of trans folks from stonewall…
Maybe but you had 10/10 denial of rights versus like 5/10
The choice was still obvious.
They weren’t?