Doug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoProblem solved.lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square254fedilinkarrow-up1728arrow-down141
arrow-up1687arrow-down1external-linkProblem solved.lemmy.worldDoug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square254fedilink
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up116arrow-down1·1 year agoAlso: why not give Texas back to Mexico? It’d solve their obsession with “the border problem.”
minus-squarejmcs@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up96·1 year agoBecause Mexico already has enough problems without having to deal with Texans?
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·1 year agoBut think of all the oil they could sell to the US!
minus-squarejmcs@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 year agoThere are Texans on top of that oil.
minus-squareFundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoThey would just move back into the Us. And with the settlers gone, indigenous people may be allowed ot move back.
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agowaves hand minor inconvenience.
Also: why not give Texas back to Mexico? It’d solve their obsession with “the border problem.”
Because Mexico already has enough problems without having to deal with Texans?
But think of all the oil they could sell to the US!
There are Texans on top of that oil.
They would just move back into the Us. And with the settlers gone, indigenous people may be allowed ot move back.
waves hand minor inconvenience.