French operator SNCF has previously asked passengers to self-declare as 'Monsieur' or 'Madame'.

French operator SNCF has previously asked passengers to self-declare as ‘Monsieur’ or ‘Madame’.

The EU’s top court ruled on Thursday that requiring rail passengers to declare a gender when buying a ticket is in breach of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1535·
    1 day ago

    Is this like the first step towards having gender-specific train cars? Does France have an issue with harassment on trains like some other countries/cultures? Or are they just being weird about gender?

    • Hawke@lemmy.worldEnglish
      62·
      1 day ago

      I think it’s the opposite of that. They stopped asking about the gender of the passengers.

        • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          16·
          23 hours ago

          Asking whether they write sir or madam on the ticket as a form of politeness. Sure it helps collecting statistics too.

          Conservative are weird, the will be fine with asking sir or madam, but would throw a tantrum if you ask them a pronoum which is exactly the same question

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.worldEnglish
            7·
            22 hours ago

            Sure, but is that a reason to make it mandatory? If someone does not want to share the information, then saying “non, we must be polite to you!” doesn’t make a lot of sense.

            • jagged_circle@feddit.nlEnglish
              3·
              14 hours ago

              Probably whoever drafted the requirements for the software team just didn’t think to add a third option, and the software team didn’t want to add additional requirements.

        • Hawke@lemmy.worldEnglish
          241·
          1 day ago

          Probably a mixture of tradition/inertia and old-fashioned identification ideas.

          • grue@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            23 hours ago

            That’s the excuse, anyway. Only SNCF’s marketing department knows if it was the real reason.

          • ikt@aussie.zoneEnglish
            28·
            22 hours ago

            The case was brought by the French association Mousse, whose mission is to “campaign for justice for the LGBTQI+ community,” according to its website.

            Team Rainbow making more friends

            • gift_of_gab@lemmy.worldEnglish
              4·
              20 hours ago

              I wanted to see if you were the same name I remember posting similar eye-roll inducing things in the past but, you know:

              deleted by creator

              • ikt@aussie.zoneEnglish
                22·
                13 hours ago

                Bonjour Monsieur! (Please don’t sue me 😱)

                That’s ok, sometimes I’m right, sometimes I’m wrong, I tried to block many of the more extreme left wing progressive instances on this website (there is a lot) but it didn’t let me, hopefully in a future patch I can block all lgtbq++ premium content and leave it just for you guys to read and comment on, then you won’t have to suffer with me like I do you :(

                Thanks again for letting me know you dislike my viewpoints, this means very little to me though as I’m aware that you dislike my viewpoints, you may not believe this but I disagree with some of your viewpoints as well! I just don’t go around literally posting that I’m rolling my eyes as you guys seem to do quite often?

                • gift_of_gab@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  3·
                  13 hours ago

                  … you may not believe this but I disagree with some of your viewpoints as well!

                  Such as? I didn’t give any.

                  If you think a court deciding that it’s not necessary for a train company to know your gender is ‘extreme left wing progressive’ talk, good luck in your delusional pocket of brave little right-wing cis bois. I applaud you for being such a coward that you delete your own comments rather than face criticism.

                  I wish you the best of luck being part of a belief system that requires that it devour itself. Just remember that when your friends will come for you after they come for us. You’ll never be on the inside crowd that you want to be, and one day you’ll be on the outside looking in.

                  • ikt@aussie.zoneEnglish
                    2·
                    11 hours ago

                    I applaud you for being such a coward that you delete your own comments rather than face criticism.

                    What? I don’t delete my comments due to criticism? Where did you see this?

                    I’m so confused, one look at my profile shows hours and days of discussion and having to put up with condescending smug crap like this:

                    good luck in your delusional pocket of brave little right-wing cis bois

                    Sometimes I’ll post something, realise I don’t care enough about the topic and delete my comment usually within a few minutes

    • oce 🐆@jlai.luEnglish
      22·
      1 day ago

      It was probably just data harvesting later used for marketing optimization.

      • anon6789@lemmy.worldEnglish
        12·
        24 hours ago

        I thought this was just a cynical take at first, but it prompted me to read the very brief press release attached to the OPs article. Your answer actually seems to be correct. Apologies!

        It sounds like this case was actually brought to court as a matter of unnecessary dara collection under GDPR and said if this data has no ligitimate use that it violates data minimalism requirements and should be discontinued. The rail system said they used it to tailor language used to the customer, and the courts decided that generic language could be used adequately without any gendering and to remove the question of gender.

        the Court reiterates that, for data processing to be regarded as necessary for the performance of a contract, that processing must be objectively indispensable in order to enable the proper performance of that contract. In that context, the Court finds that personalisation of the commercial communication based on presumed gender identity according to a customer’s title does not appear to be objectively indispensable in order to enable the proper performance of a rail transport contract. The railway undertaking could choose to communicate based on generic, inclusive expressions when addressing a customer, which have no correlation with the presumed gender identity of those customers. That would be a workable and less intrusive solution.

        the fundamental freedoms and rights of those customers can prevail over that legitimate [business] interest, in particular where there is a risk of discrimination on grounds of gender identity.

        It’s barely over a page to read, and as someone not covered under GDPR, is very enlightening to see a court actually defend private personal party data seriously. I recommend giving it a full read to anyone interested in data protection.

    • erin@social.sidh.bzh
      21·
      22 hours ago

      Few years back I have been attacked in a high speed train in France because of my gender. I only survived thanks to other passengers who defended me.

      • lud@lemm.eeEnglish
        1·
        21 hours ago

        Does France have a general problem with violence on trains? Stories like that can come from any place on earth with trains and humans.

        • Uruanna@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          4 hours ago

          General no, but it happens, mostly in the Paris region - then again the regional trains of other big cities don’t really make the news unless it’s a big one, so I can’t be sure.