Even through it has some flaws, e.g. it’s not fully memory safe (there are some programming languages that are even safer, like Ada)?

      • ryujin470@fedia.ioOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Just in my opinion. It’s probably a trending programming language right now. More loved than C or C++ by some developers

        • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s a hyped language because it solves many problems that has persisted with C and C++ - without having to rely on garbage collection.

          If anything, it’s underused. Not that I believe everything should be rewritten in Rust. That’s just stupid.

          • bluGill@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            As a C++ developer Rust’s borrow checker is very interesting - it promises to solve my issues with C++ without the issues that make other languages (ie Java, Python…) have in the real world. (remember we choose C++ for a reason, Java isn’t correct for our application - if Java is correct you should use that instead)

            • jansk@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              29 days ago

              If you learn Rust, you’ll find that you’d choose it over C/++ even without the brrow checker. Every little part of the development experience is just so much better.

              • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                14 days ago

                The only thing I hate about rust is how it does not respect my hard disk. It downloads all the dependencies and staticly links them into each project. Hrrrrrr