Alteon@lemmy.world to conservative@lemmy.world · 2 months agoDonald Trump walks back campaign promise to reduce grocery prices.www.huffpost.comexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down13 cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkDonald Trump walks back campaign promise to reduce grocery prices.www.huffpost.comAlteon@lemmy.world to conservative@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square21fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squarethe_toast_is_gone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down2·2 months agoPart of his platform was lowering energy prices - “Drill, Baby, Drill!” He expects grocery prices to go down as a result.
minus-squareWindex007@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoHe had a golden opportunity to make that argument and instead talked about how much property he owned and to talk about a loading dock he drove by.
minus-squarethe_toast_is_gone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down2·2 months agoIt was part of his platform and the part I emphasized shows him referencing it. The author of this article is misleading people with his headline.
minus-squarePsychodelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoYou agree with the president-elect’s assessment that reducing energy costs will result in corporations slashing prices for consumers? Do you just believe him or do you have reason to believe his assessment is accurate
minus-squarethe_toast_is_gone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·2 months agoI’m saying that’s his argument. I don’t know if it’ll work out, but this conversation started because the headline is false.
minus-squareTheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoWhy argue with you ? You have changed the subject in bad faith.
minus-squarethe_toast_is_gone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down2·2 months agoMy point the whole time has been that the article has a bad headline. If he said something like “We can’t lower prices,” then it’d make sense.
Part of his platform was lowering energy prices - “Drill, Baby, Drill!” He expects grocery prices to go down as a result.
He had a golden opportunity to make that argument and instead talked about how much property he owned and to talk about a loading dock he drove by.
It was part of his platform and the part I emphasized shows him referencing it. The author of this article is misleading people with his headline.
You agree with the president-elect’s assessment that reducing energy costs will result in corporations slashing prices for consumers? Do you just believe him or do you have reason to believe his assessment is accurate
I’m saying that’s his argument. I don’t know if it’ll work out, but this conversation started because the headline is false.
Why argue with you ? You have changed the subject in bad faith.
My point the whole time has been that the article has a bad headline. If he said something like “We can’t lower prices,” then it’d make sense.