Supposedly, an RS-26 was launched from Astrakhan and targeted at infrastructure in Dnipro.

  • BigFig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Afaik, ICBMs are trackibly loud. It’s difficult to fire one without everyone noticing immediately

    • slurpeesoforion@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      But are failed launches trackable? My point is that this may not be the first attempt. If their missile systems are anything like everything else in their arsenal, a successful launch is a one off exception.

      • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        A failed launch, as in an initially successful launch that went wrong in the air, can afterwards be spotted even on commercial satellite images: https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/09/satellite-images-suggest-test-of-russian-super-weapon-failed-spectacularly/ The usa and nato probably know long before those amateur spotters do.

        If the rocket fails to launch at all when the button is pressed, then noone will be allowed to know probably. It could be that they tried to launch 10 and only 1 ignited, or maybe there was just the one. Russia isn’t going to tell the truth about anything so it’s anyone’s guess. If it fails to ignite, then I’d expect them to just pack up the rocket again and continue to pretend doing maintenance and have soldiers guarding the stuff.

      • nexusband@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        They probably are afterwards. Most sat pics trained on that have some kind of image recognition stuff running in the background and they flag that. Apparently that’s how that Satan failure was also firstly detected

        Edit: I also wouldn’t be so sure about the ICBMs being in the same state as everything else.