produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 年前fair share?discuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square598fedilinkarrow-up12.18Karrow-down178
arrow-up12.1Karrow-down1imagefair share?discuss.tchncs.deprodunis@discuss.tchncs.de to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 年前message-square598fedilink
minus-squareIHaveTwoCows@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前Banning PAC money would di the same thing but literally zero representatives are proposing bills to do that.
minus-squarehark@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前With or without PACs, the money will find its way into politicians’ pockets.
minus-squareIHaveTwoCows@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前So in what way exactly is making that statement helpful?
minus-squarehark@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前It’s to point out that banning PACs, while a good move, wouldn’t solve the problem. A wealth tax would be much more effective.
Banning PAC money would di the same thing but literally zero representatives are proposing bills to do that.
With or without PACs, the money will find its way into politicians’ pockets.
So in what way exactly is making that statement helpful?
It’s to point out that banning PACs, while a good move, wouldn’t solve the problem. A wealth tax would be much more effective.