• ZekeSulastin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That’s not how the amendment process works. They’d need a 2/3 majority vote in both the House and the Senate to launch a proposal or 2/3 of the states to hold a constitutional convention; once the amendment is proposed, 3/4 of the states would have to ratify it.

    Besides, even a simple majority requirement wouldn’t guarantee success - for example, see the clown show for the GOP House speakership, Senators Manchin (I; D before 2024) and Sinema (I; D before Dec 2022) voting no on various Democratic initiatives, or Senator McCain (R) voting no on the ACA repeal.

    There was actually a point where we were two state governorships away from the GOP being able to hold that convention, but that’s still just the proposal.

    • Fontasia@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      He’s got the supreme court on his side, what stopping him making up just forcing things through as emergency measures?

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Nothing. The Supreme Court has no oversight whatsoever and can rule that anything is legal (or illegal) with no way to challenge it.

    • TheOtherThyme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It doesn’t matter how things are should work or how they used to work. Nothing and no one will stop the repugs from doing anything they want.