and because i’m a lazy ass i didn’t read the specs but just read the search engine result.

I also assumed that because 6 years ago i bought a $50 hp envy and it had wifi, this much expensive one is also going to have it

Result: that $250 printer doesn’t actually have wifi

    • bjorney@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago
      1. if I didn’t have a printer I would need a standalone scanner, which costs almost the same amount

      2. Driving to Staples to print a $0.10 page wastes $50 worth of time and gas

      A cheap printer pays for itself very quickly.

      • ComradeMiao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I guess it depends where your printers are.The library is a mile from me and cost .1. My work also has free printing.

        I don’t think it’s worth it in how quickly ink dried out. Those higher tier ones that print thousands per cartridge are worth it but expensive.

        • bjorney@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The library is a mile from me too, that’s a 30 minute round trip, or I have to drive and pay for parking

          I bought a $60 inkjet 10+ years ago. Every 3-4 years I buy a multipack of aftermarket ink for $30. Every 18 months when the cartridge dries up half full in my printer I chuck it knowing the $5 of ink I just wasted saved me $400 in billable hours

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’ve bought two laser printers, both for about $50.

          My 1997 laser just died this summer. That’s 27 years of runtime. Even if it was $500, that’s $18/year, with thousands of pages printed, and I think I replaced the toner once.

          Glad you have a printer nearby. I do to, but it would take me an hour to print one page, because I’d have to copy it to a thumb drive, then go to the print shop (15 min, using fossil fuels to get there), then deal with printing and hope it prints right, then shuffle back home.

          I mean, yea, that’s a fabulous approach. Do that 50 times and I’ve paid for my printer.

          • ComradeMiao@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            That sounds 100% worth it. I would also pay $500 if I knew which could last so long. I’m talking the inkjet garbage that doesn’t last and ink is more expensive than the machine.

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      I specifically bought this to print photos, ink is not ridiculously expensive like other models, is like $150 per liter, which is still high considering that’s colored water, but not the usual $5000 per liter.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      What everybody else said, plus availability.

      If I need to leave for an emergency trip at 5:00 in the morning, and I wouldn’t print stuff out for immigration before then… I basically need to have a printer at home. To be always available

      People are coming over for game night, I’ll just print out a bunch of character sheets… I didn’t have a printer I’d have to plan ahead.

      Availability, provides optionality, provides convenience. Making life easier.

      But, I’ll concede, when I had available access to 24/7 printers I didn’t buy my own. Only when I lost that access did I buy my own printer