• hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 days ago

      What does blockchain solve that existing contracts don’t do? Blockchain has takeover possibility

      • Iheartcheese@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Honestly I don’t know. I’m just pointing out the only thing that kind of sort of sounded like a good idea for it I’ve ever heard. For pictures it’s stupid that’s for sure

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 days ago

          It’s not a picture though. It’s a link to a picture on a server somewhere. If the host goes down, you own nothing.

          • Iheartcheese@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            The technology behind it can be used for things other than pictures. That’s kind of the point people are making

            • hddsx@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Right, and my original question was what does the technology solve? And so far the answer appears to be nothing

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Isn’t it just a small amount of data? If the picture is small enough you could put it directly on the blockchain.

            Dunno why you would though. It’s very limiting for no particular gain.

            • ConnecticutKen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 days ago

              But in NFTs the picture is not on the Blockchain. Only a link to the picture is on the Blockchain and the picture itself is still just on the web.

              • hddsx@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                No, they are right. What they are saying is that even though pretty much all NFTs contain a link to a picture on the blockchain, theoretically you could write a really, really small image in the space where you would normally write the URL. From a quick google, that’s 100 bytes. For a black and white image, that’s 100 pixels. For color, that’s around 30 pixels

    • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yea the idea there is that with it being decentralized, it has an unedited history. So if each block added to the chain is a new transaction, you can see previous agreements. Being decentralized also means that it’s public record and everyone can see the contract/agreement/transaction.

      There’s a lot of neat stuff that can be done, but as the other guy stated, it’s a solution looking for a problem.