Those people are responsible for the next administration (republicans) killing everyone in Gaza and Lebanon. And they just voted to fuck Taiwan & Hong Kong.
You voted for death, congratulations.
That’s bullshit. Trump is the president who took the us embassy out of tel aviv, into Jerusalem, at behest of a mega donor Christian nutbag that is trying to fast track the rapture. All because politicians are talking out of both sides of their mouths during an active hostage situation with a terrorist organization with ties to Lebanon and Iran? And DO NOT try to say I’m making excuses for Netyahu. I’m just asking you to grow up and look at the chessboard. Now its Trumps turn.
I hope you enjoy being right because the people you pretend to care about are in a much worse place you fucking empty headed dumb fuck.
This is the thing. People can’t help but think of politics/any and all opinions as binary. “You’re either left or right! Republican or democrat! You voted for trump by not voting!”
Things don’t work that way. Nothing works that way. But it’s the only way things get discussed, so it’s the only way things are understood these days. The truth is some gray, four dimensional geometric shape. But it’s only discussed and understood as a straight line with black and white sides and you’re either on one side or the other. So dumb.
Both the Republican and Democrat candidate were and are in favor of violence in various places around the globe. Either person was a vote for death.
Actually, it’s very hard not to vote for death, because when you have wars that other people are fighting in other countries, you can’t just snap your fingers and have the death magically disappear. It just doesn’t work that way. That’s not to say that the president has no power, but the president certainly doesn’t have the power to guarantee that the death stops now.
Now if you want to make a statistical argument that Trump is likely to lead to more death than Harris, go for it. And maybe you can do a good job with that, but you’re starting off by trying to argue about speculative future death compared with actual past death. If you’re into statistics, I highly encourage you to crunch the numbers and then post your data here.
I’ve previously asked something similar in a different post like a week ago. Why do people keep referring to Hong Kong as a place the US could intervene?
Taiwan, I understand, the status there is unclear and the US sells weapons and provides other military aid.
Hong Kong though? What exactly are people imagining the US would do under any administration, when most countries have the One China Principle (including the US) as official foreign policy?
As much as the people of Hong Kong may or may not like it depending on their own views, basically no country has come out in support of any independence for the region. Like it or not, Hong Kong is part of China, and I don’t foresee any country seriously intervening in any way in China’s one country, now more like 1.5 systems, 2 systems arrangement.
Can someone explain this random talking point? I just don’t understand.
Those people are responsible for the next administration (republicans) killing everyone in Gaza and Lebanon. And they just voted to fuck Taiwan & Hong Kong. You voted for death, congratulations.
And Ukraine
plus females, LGBTQ+ and every child that dies from a childhood disease in the USA.
And atheists, Muslims, Jews, any non Christians really.
Americans forgot about Ukraine long ago
Not true, I just left it out as an oversight. Слава Україні!
You rolled over on your back and told the dems you’d vote for them no matter what while they were actively funding a genocide. It’s on you
Watch trump help netanyahu destroy gaza.
Perhaps saying that the Palestinians are all going to die either way wasn’t exactly a strong rallying call.
I’ve been watching Biden do it for a year, do you sincerely believe kamala would’ve stopped it? I don’t think you do
That’s bullshit. Trump is the president who took the us embassy out of tel aviv, into Jerusalem, at behest of a mega donor Christian nutbag that is trying to fast track the rapture. All because politicians are talking out of both sides of their mouths during an active hostage situation with a terrorist organization with ties to Lebanon and Iran? And DO NOT try to say I’m making excuses for Netyahu. I’m just asking you to grow up and look at the chessboard. Now its Trumps turn.
I hope you enjoy being right because the people you pretend to care about are in a much worse place you fucking empty headed dumb fuck.
You’re pants on head delusional if you think the democrats would lift a finger to protect anybody
Did you vote?
I sure did, psl
This is the thing. People can’t help but think of politics/any and all opinions as binary. “You’re either left or right! Republican or democrat! You voted for trump by not voting!”
Things don’t work that way. Nothing works that way. But it’s the only way things get discussed, so it’s the only way things are understood these days. The truth is some gray, four dimensional geometric shape. But it’s only discussed and understood as a straight line with black and white sides and you’re either on one side or the other. So dumb.
Both the Republican and Democrat candidate were and are in favor of violence in various places around the globe. Either person was a vote for death.
Actually, it’s very hard not to vote for death, because when you have wars that other people are fighting in other countries, you can’t just snap your fingers and have the death magically disappear. It just doesn’t work that way. That’s not to say that the president has no power, but the president certainly doesn’t have the power to guarantee that the death stops now.
Now if you want to make a statistical argument that Trump is likely to lead to more death than Harris, go for it. And maybe you can do a good job with that, but you’re starting off by trying to argue about speculative future death compared with actual past death. If you’re into statistics, I highly encourage you to crunch the numbers and then post your data here.
I’ve previously asked something similar in a different post like a week ago. Why do people keep referring to Hong Kong as a place the US could intervene?
Taiwan, I understand, the status there is unclear and the US sells weapons and provides other military aid.
Hong Kong though? What exactly are people imagining the US would do under any administration, when most countries have the One China Principle (including the US) as official foreign policy?
As much as the people of Hong Kong may or may not like it depending on their own views, basically no country has come out in support of any independence for the region. Like it or not, Hong Kong is part of China, and I don’t foresee any country seriously intervening in any way in China’s one country, now more like 1.5 systems, 2 systems arrangement.
Can someone explain this random talking point? I just don’t understand.