• adam_y@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It sort of is.

          He used his executive position to kill the story.

          Could they have written the headline, “Washington Post Endorsement Killed by Bezos”?

          Sure. But tradition dictates you lead with the person. People are interested in people.

          You are right. It is click-baity, but that’s because it is a newspaper headline and all newspaper headlines are “click bait”. They literally invented it. That’s why we have headlines. Often in bold and large type.

          I disagree that this is misleading though, especially if you expect folk to read the whole sentence.

        • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You’re right and that’s not what’s written there. It is “killed [object/action]” i.e. the endorsement.

          To me this thread sounds more like ragebait than the original title.

    • BeN9o@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      “Jeff Bezos shut down Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris, paper reports” is that better? Now can you talk about the fucked up topic of the rich controlling media instead of the wording of a title ffs?

      • Subtracty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I noticed you haven’t commented on the post in any other capacity. You’re welcome to do so. I was just responding to the fact that it is wild to read “Jeff Bezos killed…” as the beginning of a headline when I woke up in the morning.