• Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      Patents don’t protect art

      Edit: ok, apparently “prior art” might be a phase in US patent law. I don’t quite understand what it means. In my country patents protect functions, not expressions of ideas (art)

      • GreenSkree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        28 days ago

        My understanding of a patent (in the US) is that it’s only for new, novel concepts, often difficult to design or conceive.

        Prior art, in this context, are just examples of this concept already in use or demonstrated. If there are already examples of the idea in use by others, then your idea isn’t new (and therefore not patentable).