• Steve@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Is it absurd that the maker of a tech product controls it by writing it a list of plain language guidelines? or am I out of touch?

    • Kg. Madee Ⅱ.@mathstodon.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      @fasterandworse @dgerard I mean, it is absurd. But it is how it works: an LLM is a black box from a programming perspective, and you cannot directly control what it will output.
      So you resort to pre-weighting certain keywords in the hope that it will nudge the system far enough in your desired direction.
      There is no separation between code (what the provider wants it to do) and data (user inputs to operate on) in this application 🥴

    • ebu@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      simply ask the word generator machine to generate better words, smh

      this is actually the most laughable/annoying thing to me. it betrays such a comprehensive lack of understanding of what LLMs do and what “prompting” even is. you’re not giving instructions to an agent, you are feeding a list of words to prefix to the output of a word predictor

      in my personal experiments with offline models, using something like “below is a transcript of a chat log with XYZ” as a prompt instead of “You are XYZ” immediately gives much better results. not good results, but better