• demesisx@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Have these people ever tried to code using chatGPT? It’s wrong SO often.

    Edit: maybe they know this but they want to drive down the price of developers by pretending they don’t need them anymore. I would not be surprised if this were the case here.

    • Buckshot@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      it can barely get single functions correct but we’re supposed to believe it can write entire systems from a single prompt? Either way our job at the moment is writing instructions for another piece of software (compiler) to turn into the code. This just adds another level of abstraction. High level programming languages already let us do more with fewer staff. It didn’t make coders redundant, it let to even more software.

      edit: forgot to add, agree with your edit, that or just trying to inflate their stock prices.

    • glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      That is why I already ask it to generate unit tests for its AI generated functions as well, which are also wrong semantically sometimes…

    • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Exactly. They’ll be signing contracts with “AI” coding farms in India which will just be staffed by overworked and un(der)paid interns and/or junior devs.