• MaeBorowski@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    Communes have almost nothing to do with communism. When you are living in a capitalist world and beholden to a capitalist economy, you are not suddenly experiencing communism just because you live on a collective farm. A commune is not “doing communism,” not because they are doing something wrong or anything, but because it simply doesn’t work like that. In a simple definition of communism, the workers own the means of production. The people living on a commune within capitalism still do not own the means of production, they still exist almost entirely at the whims of the broader capitalist economic structure.

    Also, it’s just ridiculous to expect a tiny microcosm of any system to represent how sound that system is if it were to be scaled up. Especially when that microcosm is inside of another structure that will actively stamp it out of existence if it threatens to grow. Trying to build a commune within a capitalist country is like trying to build a town at the bottom of the ocean. Everything beyond the limits of your project is hostile to its existence simply as a matter of the surrounding natural forces. But just because it’s extremely hard to build a town at the bottom of the ocean, and when it was tried it ended in failure, doesn’t mean that towns in general are destined to fail. In an appropriate environment they can and do thrive.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Excellent post. To add, Engels does a great refutation of these utopian socialist / commune projects, in Socialism, utopian and scientific.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      But it’s a natural state of existence to exist within a broader, hostile context.

      Civilization, at all levels, has always been that. Competition is everywhere.

      If a system requires nothing else to be competing with it, in order to work, then it’s not viable.

      • MaeBorowski@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        But it’s a natural state of existence to exist within a broader, hostile context.

        No it’s not. A commune within a communist society would not at all exist within a hostile context but in one that nurtures it. Likewise a billionaire’s corporation like Bezos’ amazon dot com does not exist in a naturally hostile context under capitalism, it exists in a context that literally would not allow it to fail, propping it up at all costs. The banks that should have gone under and been utterly annihilated in 2008 were instead propped up and rewarded for their complete failure and sheer incompetence to the extent that mass amounts of wealth were siphoned away from working class to keep them afloat.

        Civilization, at all levels, has always been that. Competition is everywhere.

        Civilization at all levels has always required profound amounts of cooperation to come into being, to continue to exist, and to thrive. Civilization exists only because of cooperation, not because of competition. Competition has always existed too, but has been more of a hindrance than a benefit to civilization and certainly not a requirement like cooperation is. The cult-like worship of competition is something that the capitalists have fostered and spread for the obvious reason that widespread belief in this lie is beneficial to them. I would urge you not to fall for a very obvious and simple-minded ploy.

        If a system requires nothing else to be competing with it, in order to work, then it’s not viable.

        Gibberish.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        So what’s your broader hostile context? Or are you living an unnatural life?

        Is it the landlord or corporate owner putting the boot to your neck because you need a roof over your head and food in your belly?

        If so do you think your life would lose meaning if the boot was lifted from your neck?

        Do you really think it’s unnatural to have all your needs met?