coffee_whatever@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agorulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1260arrow-down10
arrow-up1260arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.worldcoffee_whatever@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squareCethin@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-21 year agoIn reality, the arbiter is a private official who is being paid by the corporation. It doesn’t seem great for business if they side against them…
minus-squarep3n@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThis is true, but it wouldn’t actually be the first time that an arbiter gave an unfavorable result to its employer: https://youtu.be/u9Jmi9BOBNA?si=mOEPKERF8Z8YFrOi&t=8m38s
In reality, the arbiter is a private official who is being paid by the corporation. It doesn’t seem great for business if they side against them…
This is true, but it wouldn’t actually be the first time that an arbiter gave an unfavorable result to its employer: https://youtu.be/u9Jmi9BOBNA?si=mOEPKERF8Z8YFrOi&t=8m38s