• Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        A peeve of mine is the term “pet peeve”. 😅

        If something bothers you so, why the fuck would you keep, nurture, and tend to it as a pet?

        I propose it change to haunting peeve, because you don’t want it, can’t get rid of it, and it exists regardless if you think about it or not.

        😁 (I’m not super serious about this, but “pet peeve” really does low-key bother me)

          • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Omg you are an actual person. Every time I see your username under a post I, for whatever reason, think it’s the community name.

            I’ve seen a lot of your posts I think 😅 thanks for what you do! 🫡

            (No it didn’t register that I replied to you until I went back to look… I don’t really -see- usernames)

              • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I like that you like sharing memes, because I’ve come across them enough to think you are a community unto yourself.

                I like sorting by new to report garbage and interact with things that would otherwise die, also to help Lemmy grow! It’s lonely in new but… i get to report a lot of weird stuff… so there’s that 🫠

        • ElHexo [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s partly a joke (your favourite peeve, for example) and probably a reference to the other, now archaic, meaning of pet:

          fit of peevishness, offense or ill-humor at feeling slighted

          I think you can accept idioms as they are or you’ll be endlessly feeling like one saying or another has got your goat

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, you see he is the literal human embodiment of the concept of bias and was letting us know. The other tweets are unrelated

      • Infynis@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s true, that’s why his role as Tuvok was so impressive. The exact opposite of type casting

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve noticed that grammar error a lot on the Internet. Bias is discussed frequently as a topic of popular rage-bait posts.

      FYI for those people: “bias” is a noun that is the thing, and “biased” is an adjective that describes a person who has the bias. “The biased person showed their bias” for example.

      • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just because you understand someone well enough to correct them doesn’t mean everyone else will

        Just because you understand them well enough today doesn’t mean you will tomorrow

        We should all be striving to be better than we are, not breeding resentment from contentment

        • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just because you understand someone well enough to correct them doesn’t mean everyone else will

          Then they should ask for clarification.

          Just because you understand them well enough today doesn’t mean you will tomorrow

          At which point you can ask for clarification.

          We should all be striving to be better than we are, not breeding resentment from contentment

          And part of “better” is having the perspective and desire to avoid pedantry where it’s not needed.

          • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            We’re clearly not going to agree here. Plenty of people would rather be made aware of their mistakes and that’s no less valid than your point of view. Personally I would rather avoid potential misunderstandings than deal with them after the fact. I’m not the only one who feels that way.

          • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Interesting choice given the way that’s been shifting slowly back to the more accurate form in the past however many years.

            If colloquial usage did trump all, irregardless would’ve been acknowledged as a correct word well before I was born. It may be the driving force but it’s hardly the only, or even constantly deciding, factor

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, what’s the deal with that. Yes, the two sound similar, but saying “I’m bias” is like saying “I’m anger” instead of “I’m angry” or “I’m sadness” instead of “I’m sad”.

      • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s like the “would of” people. They don’t hear it in speech so they type it how it sounds to them.

        Or it’s autocorrect

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For people over a certain age I always assume they’re using text to speech and don’t worry about going back and correcting it. My wife is somehow always talking to someone else in the room while she dictates to her watch, so I have a lot of fun interpreting her texts.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unrelated to Trek, one of my favorite Twitch streams was watching AOC play Among Us with Ilhan Omar, Canadian MP Jagmeet Singh, and a bunch of YouTubers like Jack Septiceye and ContraPoints. The way Omar would giggle every time she killed somebody was adorable.

  • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember this cool stuff? Now it’s just a fascist site with RW morons trying to out-nazi each other.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Janeway leads with focus on her mission - to get her crew home

    I don’t believe that AOC has seen more than about three episodes of Voyager. If she had seen at least three, the statistical likelihood that she would have seen one where Janeway yanks the crew into some conflict they have absolutely no business involving themselves in would approach 100%

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      yanks the crew into some conflict they have absolutely no business involving themselves

      That’s all of Star Trek.

      In fact, that’s almost all of most of the space drama series.

    • HairHeel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Poor statement of her mission. IIRC Janeway says pretty clearly in one of the first episodes that they’re still going to carry out their duty as a Starfleet ship to seek out new life and new civilizations, boldly go, etc. That’s their mission, and getting home is an important part but not all of it.

  • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    By Trek’s logic, Tuvix’s identical copy lives in an alternative universe of some sort. And that’s really the only way to justify all this.

    Ed: Also the “Oh wait, they can’t speak so someone has to speak for them” has some interesting implications, doesn’t it.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Trek has no true multiverse in the modern sense of the concept. It’s more of a single-timeline with occasional aberrations. It has the occasional “alternate timeline”, but almost always uses the concept that those are temporary and collapse once the “real” timeline is restored - unless some important event or other metaphysical technobabble causes them to remain stable.

      The only major examples of timelines that didn’t seem to vanish after the protagonists had left are the Mirror Universe and the Kelvin Timeline. There are little pocket loops here and there, but by and large it seems that there is One True Timeline that can be reshaped, but doesn’t branch endlessly.

      That said, you gotta figure that the Mirror Universe version of Tuvix got wind of the plan to split him in half and did some splitting of his own.

      • Stamets [Mirror]@startrek.websiteOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t even think that the Mirror Universe version of Tuvix could happen. The only reason that Voyager was stranded was Janeways insistence of not letting the Kazon control the Caretakers Array/Kill the Ocampans. In the Mirror Universe, would that even happen? Either Janeway takes everyone back or they use the Array to control that section of the Delta Quadrant.

        • 5C5C5C@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mirror universe Janeway would use the caretaker technology to conquer the Delta Quadrant and become the Borg queen without even being assimilated.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that it is still widely discussed even after so many years, proves is such a great episode with a great moral dilemma.

    Whether they chose is the right choice or not, I can not say.

    But from a story perspective, all I can say is that I didn’t really like the character of Tuvix, too whiney and weird. While Neelix may not be everyone’s favourite, Tuvok definitely was an excellent addition to the team. So for my enjoyment, they did make the right choice.

    • Stamets [Mirror]@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      When you read the script for the episode Tuvix, or when you watched the show, what was your conclusion on the ethical problem? I thought it was wrong of them to kill Tuvix. Nelix and Tuvok were dead, killing Tuvix to bring them back was murder. Im interested in your opinion.

      There was a small voice inside of me that agrees with you but I also knew that if I had two loved ones that would disappear forever, I might have to make an unpleasant but necessary choice. It remains an interesting dilemma.

      Source

        • Stamets [Mirror]@startrek.websiteOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I will not stand for this Neelix slander. He is a loved one and is wonderful. Maybe too colorful at times, maybe tried too hard at times, but did his best and was a fabulous addition to the crew.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Further to the link. Tuvix is a character in star trek voyager. There is a transporter accident that ends up welding 2 other characters (Lieutenant Tuvok, Neelix) into 1 individual. The episode is spent trying to resolve this issue.

      By the end, Captain Janeway is given a solution. They can reverse the process and recover Tuvok and Neelix. Unfortunately this will destroy Tuvix. Tuvix, meanwhile has developed on his own. He doesn’t want to die and makes that clear. Janeway has the dilemma. She can do nothing, and let Tuvix live, or kill him to bring Tuvok and Neelix back.

      Basically, it’s the trolley problem. Do nothing, and 2 people die, or kill 1 yourself, to save them.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I don’t get is why they didn’t do some technofoolery with the transporters to make a copy of Tuvix and then just split that one. In a universe where there’s two William Rikers there’s gotta be a way to use transporters to clone.

        • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          You kinda have to accept the bounds of the problem as stated in order for it to be worth thinking about. It undercuts the value of the experiment if you just say “I find a solution other than those presented which denied the central conflict entirely”.

        • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          My personal headcanon is that they would have had they had the full resources of Starfleet at their disposal. The Riker incident was, as far as we know, non-reproducible, or someone somewhere would have found a way to weaponize it.

        • HairHeel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Terrible idea. Any time a transporter duplicates somebody, one of them turns evil. (See the DS9 episode where Tom Riker pretends to be Will Riker and hijacks the Defiant, or the reason Harry Kim, who was replaced by his own duplicate early on in the series, never got a promotion).

          So now you have to decide to kill Good Tuvix, or kill the other one, which will just give you Evil Tuvok and Evil Neelix.

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Undid the process and restored Neelix and Tuvok, thereby killing Tuvix.

        • Stamets [Mirror]@startrek.websiteOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Tuvok and Neelix were individuals but merged into one being, Tuvix. Tuvix had the knowledge and memories of both individuals but existed in one body. One mind. He knew everything the other two did but had his own opinions and reasonings and individuality. The Doctor onboard attempts to find a fix but is unable. He promises to find a solution.

          A couple of weeks pass and Tuvix has taken over the duties of both Tuvok and Neelix. He’s developing some friendships and relationships. He’s even more effective in certain situations than his counterpart would have been due to the unique perspective he has. He’s settled in. Then the Doctor informs Captain Janeway and Tuvix that he’s discovered a solution and a way to split Tuvix back into Tuvok and Neelix. Everyone is on board except Tuvix who announces he doesn’t want to die after gaining his own identity.

          Janeway is forced into a horrible position. She wants her friends back but also she wants to respect this lifeform and unique person. She hears from Tuvix and other crew members on what their opinion is. Tuvix obviously is against it. Heavily. Kes, Neelix’s girlfriend, desperately wants Neelix back. Tuvok also happens to be Janeways close advisor and close personal friend. After some time, Janeway comes out and asks Tuvix to come with her to sickbay. She is ordering that he undergo the procedure.

          Tuvix immediately rebels and starts pleading for his life from various crew members on the bridge. All ignore him and look away. He then attempts to run away but Security officers stop him. Janeway leads him to Sick Bay where he continues to plead for his life. The Doctor, aware of Tuvix refusal to undergo the procedure, also refuses to do the procedure. However the procedure is relatively simple to perform. Tuvix is sat down on a bed and split back into Tuvok and Neelix. Janeway welcomes the men back and then leaves Sick Bay with a look of self doubt and horror on her face, deeply shaken.

          Here’s the scene. It’s a little edited but you see the broadstrokes.

  • ElHexo [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Janeway is a blood-crazed necromancer who obviously lept at the opportunity to kill someone to bring two people back

    Good thing they had an organ printer otherwise she’d be chopping people up for their kidneys

  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been watching Voyager for the first time and just got to the episode. I think I agree with the decision (as a lever-puller) but it does raise some interesting questions. As Janeway mentions, if they’d been able to do it immediately, she’d have done it without question, but after two weeks of Tuvix integrating with the crew it’s a more difficult question. If Tuvix had been around for say 5 years I think I’d disagree with separating him. I think the way I look at it is that the social bonds possessed by Tuvok and Neelix are more important than the mere two week old bonds of Tuvix, but if Tuvok and Neelix were long dead and their loved ones had already mourned them, while Tuvix had had more time to become a fixture in people’s lives, then the circumstances would be different. Tbh I disagree with the idea that Tuvok and Neelix get the biggest say - I think that the input of Kes and the rest of the crew is valuable, and Kes pleads to get Neelix back while none of the crew back Tuvix.

    Does that mean the worth of lives is based on popularity? Not generally, but I do think that social connections are a relevant thing to consider. Part of what makes murder bad is not just the loss of the individual’s life, but also what it means for everyone else. If you could press a button to create a life then press another to end it, would you have made the world a worse place by doing so? I don’t think so. But if you press a button to create a life then go out and murder someone who already existed, then I think you have.

    I’d also say that the captain’s responsibilities in her role as captain are relevant and also support the decision.