• diegeticscream[all]🔻@lemmygrad.ml
    1·
    2 years ago

    You quoted part of a sentence. That was part of a question. Questions and claims are not the same things.

    It was not a question. This is the full quote of your original claim:

    Figure out a way to implement communism without creating a Stalin that takes advantage of the situation to seize power, and we can talk.

    Your implications are:

    • that Stalin was bad.
    • that Stalin wrongly “seized power”.
    • that Stalin wrongly held onto power.

    I asked: “If Stalin was so intent on seizing power, why’d he try to resign so much?”. I think that neutralizes all three of your implied claims.

    You have not answered.

      • diegeticscream[all]🔻@lemmygrad.ml
        1·
        2 years ago

        I don’t agree that you have.

        I’ve seen you make unsupported speculations as to what caused him to resign, and why those resignations were refused.

        It’s ok to admit that you don’t know what you’re talking about.

        • Candelestine@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          2 years ago

          I think my argument about how it’s not actually physically possible to be unable to resign was rather compelling.

          Regardless I have answered your question, even if you dislike my answer. I have certainly tried at least. Can you answer mine yet?

            • Candelestine@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              2 years ago

              That is a very easy thing for you to say. It is, however, an answer, even if you think it is incorrect. You haven’t even tried to take mine on, however. Do you need more time or something?