Well, my friend, he’s kinda poor he can’t afford some books and some streaming services, so he pirates. He pirate books, audiobook and videos and other stuff. Sometimes he buys books he likes a lot out of loyalty to the author (yeah, I don’t understand it either), he likes to read physical books, but yeah, if he hates the author or just wants to skim through it, he will download the book.

He usually doesn’t like to pirate from small companies or professors who are trying to make a living by selling books, but from millionaires & plenty of mega corps which already have loads of money, he feels like it’s the right move to pirate

Also, have you ever noticed that you have felt that the value of a product has decreased just because you didn’t pay for it, thus you are less interested to read it? i.e., had you paid for the book, you would have more likely read that book.

He says he will buy stuff when his time is more valuable than money, let’s all hope that day is soon.

What are your piracy habits?

  • drcouzelis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t have an answer to your exact question but I want to emphasize…

    NOTHING in the history of humankind has ever existed like computer data. A 100% identical copy of videos, pictures, and music can be made almost instantly at what is essentially zero cost to the original holder of the data. Any comparison to “stealing” or to a physical object (a car lol) just falls flat because the situation is just so different.

    Practically speaking, the world we live in, with computers everywhere, cheap storage, and easy fast internet access for so much of the world, has only been around for about two decades, maybe three. NOTHING like this has ever existed before, and businesses, culture, and laws have been very slow to catch up.

    I’m not saying pirating is right or wrong, just that the whole idea is still so new that society hasn’t caught up to it yet.

    • LrdThndr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In Babylon Alexandria, docking ships were required to surrender any and all written materials to the library. There, scribes would make a copy of everything that was submitted.

      The originals of the documents were stored in the library and the copies were given back to the ships.

      First instance of intellectual property piracy?

      • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        First instance of intellectual property piracy?

        Perhaps, but of course there are still significant differences.

        To make these copies you needed a team of highly skilled scribes and their accoutrements, and the ship had to wait in port for several days.

        That is to say, these copies in babylon would have come at a significant cost.

    • Ganesh Venugopal@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      NOTHING in the history of humankind has ever existed like computer data. A 100% identical copy of videos, pictures, and music can be made almost instantly at what is essentially zero cost to the original holder of the data. Any comparison to “stealing” or to a physical object (a car lol) just falls flat because the situation is just so different.

      YES!

      Nice comment, tq!

    • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      NOTHING in the history of humankind has ever existed like computer data. A 100% identical copy of videos, pictures, and music can be made almost instantly at what is essentially zero cost to the original holder of the data. Any comparison to “stealing” or to a physical object (a car lol) just falls flat because the situation is just so different.

      old uk piracy ads used the line “Piracy is theft!”
      the funny thing is that it wasn’t actually legally theft
      theft required (and still does i think) depriving the rightful owner of the goods themselves

    • sock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      thats a super copey way to say you pirate and dont see it as wrong. digital or not its still a product so the rules are the same.

      of course the rule being pirate from big companies and try to not pirate indie stuff (unless ur a poor college student)

      i pirate all my games and movies generally but i would pay if i liked a game a lot. but piracy is bad for the sole reason of if everyone pirated hypothetically then digital content would likely cease to exist which would also be bad. or maybe not if ur amish

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Digital content wouldn’t cease to exist, it just wouldn’t be able to be monetised.

        The content would once again be made by the people who are passionate about those projects, and not about the greedy shareholders that want mediocre content just enough to get people to pay for it and line their own pockets.

  • TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is no ethical consumption under capitalism. Even if I pay for a product I love some asshole suit is going to get a bigger cut than the artists who did the work.

    • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m an indie author, and all my novels ended up on PDFdrive.

      Not that I’d be mad about it. If someone pirates my books and likes them, maybe they’ll support me in the future.

      Just saying, I’m not wearing suits. I’m working full-time and write when I have off and got the time and energy.

      For us Indies, getting eyeballs on our books is next to impossible anyways, so I already gave up on the idea that writing will ever be more than an expensive hobby.

      • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep! Often the math is “the people who pirated probably wouldn’t have bought your product if they couldn’t pirate it, so you didn’t lose anything. But you did gain a reader, who can now recommend it to others, and / or make future purchases themselves”. Generally speaking, pirating isn’t bad to the bottom line (not saying it’s good).

        It hurts brick and mortar stores, but then, so do libraries. (Hah)

        • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve always been of the opinion that people who truly love what they piratesd will at some point want the author to carry on writing. Just like someone who just stumbled upon your work by accident. That’s the beauty of humanity, people do remember, and they do care, and creative arts are a pursuit that connects author and reader.

        • Ganesh Venugopal@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          It hurts brick and mortar stores, but then, so do libraries. (Hah)

          libraries are not comparable to what damage piracy does to brick and mortar stores and small authors

      • TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If we had any sense as a species we would be funding artists so that they can pursue their art full time. Industry advances technology, but art advances the mind.

        • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We might end up like people who do graphics… replaced by AI tools. There aren’t any that make it as easy yet (and maybe there won’t), but who knows where tech will lead us.

          If you do it as a hobby, you don’t need to worry about it so much, but it does take something away for sure.

          • TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            AI will change the game, but I think after an initial period of growing pains that we’re really facing a shift in the economy whether we’re ready or not. All of the “problems” of capitalism have been due to runaway efficiency. A scarcity economy is absurd when we’re infinitely capable of producing everything people want or need.

            • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree, and the optimist in me desperately wants to experience a post-scarcity society like the one we’re seeing in the The Culture books, where AIs run the world, and we humans are free to chase whatever it is we’re dreaming of.

              Maybe that’s a romantic notion, but I’m hesitant to give up on in. Dreams are what’s kept us going for the past millennia.

              • Zippy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You might become bored and depression does seem to be more common when you do not have a particular sense of purpose.

                I like the idea as well but human psychology might not be so conductive to easy living.

                • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You mean, being forced to find your own meaning instead of just going down a socially acceptable to-do list?

                  Boredom is simply a lack of imagination and drugs.

                • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What do you mean when you say we need a purpose?

                  We are biologically designed to reproduce. So our current purpose is to survive until we’re grown to sexual maturity, reproduce, then raise our offspring to a stage where they’re able to survive on their own. Then, we either do it again, if we’re still young enough, or die and make room for the next generation. That seems like a very depressing purpose to me, but this is how evolution works.

                  I think that we now have the intellectual capacity to transcendent this cycle. We’ve been for a while, and we formed societies, developed technology. Our first models were small tribes, very much hippie-like little communities, that suffered from attrition by tribe warfare and rule of the strongest, where reproduction was controlled by “the fittest”. Then we developed monarchic systems that provided a much more stable life for everyone, but ran on servitude (slavery) of peasants. We experimented with systems like communism, that then lead to terror by the ruling class (can still see that in China today), and landed on a somewhat democracy-adjacent system of capitalism that we’re running today, and that’s not sustainable, because we’re destroying our planet.

                  What’s next, and what purpose for the individual do you have in mind?

      • Ganesh Venugopal@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        For us Indies, getting eyeballs on our books is next to impossible anyways, so I already gave up on the idea that writing will ever be more than an expensive hobby.

        I am sorry to hear that. If it ended up on pdf drive, then I guess it’s either that, enough people want to read it or pdf drive has a bot which is ruthlessly uploading all the books it can find. Have you tried self publishing on kindle? Also, name your books if you want to, it looks like some eyeballs and popularity will do you some good.

        • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I tried on Kindle, but the reality is that every day, a six-digit number of books are being released, which leads to insane odds.

          I wrote cyberpunk/urban fantasy crossover books, but am now switching over to space opera. If you’re still interested, I can give you the title of the “entry book” that starts the story.

        • Ganesh Venugopal@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          not ideal, you know, I would prefer it if creators had pay links attached to their accounts and you could anonymously send them money. Pirate something, pay the creator some money if you can. I mean, if enough people do it, the corps would be forced to change the game.

          • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How do you tip say 500 people who made a film?

            The sentiment is great. I’d love this also, but for film it won’t work.

    • alokir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      So you pirate it and donate the normal price to the author directly, right?

      • Susaga@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        When I was in university, I watched a movie online using alternative means that I had been kind of interested in, but never went to see. I then watched it again. Then I went out and bought a DVD.

        A little after that, I watched a lets play of a game that basically gave the entire experience in a single watch. I liked the game enough that I bought it immediately and just let it sit on my steam library without an install, just so the creator would receive their dues.

        A year or so ago, I got a game through a charity bundle and wound up playing hundreds of hours of it. Since the creators got no money from my purchase, I bought merch, and waited for DLC to come out for me to buy instantly, just so they’d get something from me.

        Recently, a AAA studio let go a bunch of creators while their game was wrapping up, essentially punishing them for a job well done. The creators will get nothing if I buy the game they made, but the studio that screwed them over will get everything. Just like I always have, I will give as much as they deserve to receive.

      • TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sometimes, when it’s particularly impactful. But you can save your shaming for somebody who cares about your opinion. The fact that you’ve given me more attention than anybody with the power to change things shows where your allegiance lies.

        • alokir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know what you mean by “allegiance”, you were talking about ethics and that authors don’t get what they deserve. Your problem was not compensation itself but that some people that you don’t think deserve it get a bigger cut than you’re comfortable with.

          It logically follows that in this frame of mind the ethical thing to do is to cut out the middle man and compensate the original author for their work directly.

          I don’t know what kind of box you put me into based on one sentence but not everyone is out to get you who doesn’t 100% agree with you. This is why civil discussion is not possible online anymore.

          • uberkalden@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            The problem is that pirates are mostly full of shit. They just don’t want to pay. It’s that simple. Everything else is an attempt to rationalize.

            • Efwis@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not completely true. Are there shot pirates yes, just like there are shit uploaders that think it’s fun to bundle a computer virus with downloadable content.

              If it’s something new, like a new book or movie, I will pay for it. The movies/shows I pirate are old and mostly out of circulation, unless they are streaming on some service. I pay for those so their is monetary transactions.

              For example, I just recently spent 2 days downloading CHiPs original tv series, even with my high speed broadband it was that slow because there aren’t that many people offering it. Took me 3 days to find it to dl.

              Not all piracy is bad. New stuff, ok not cool. But older stuff that has had a good run, the loss of revenue to creator/publisher is so minimal that they won’t feel it.

              I’m an ethical pirate, if I think it’s worth watching over and over again I’ll buy it, if it’s available. I won’t pirate software or books.

              I have kindle for reading and there is nothing new worth downloading software wise, plus I use linux on my computer, so all my software is free anyway, and if I can’t donate financially I find other ways to help. I’m not a big gamer and when I do game it’s on console, so I do pay for that.

          • TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            You want to criticize my protest and waste my time, but when was the last time you sent an email to an elected official?

            • alokir@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not some kind of activist set out to undermine your movement, I asked a question. This is an online forum where anyone can comment, if you feel like it’s wasting your time then don’t answer.

              when was the last time you sent an email to an elected official?

              Last time? A few months ago when a chinese company wanted to build a chemical distribution center in my district.

  • Stuka@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Give me a reasonably priced, accessible way to enjoy the content and I will happily pay for it.

    Streaming has become untenable and now it’s neither affordable nor convenient to watch what I want to watch. And with how frequently shows and movies bounce around platforms, who knows if the show I want to watch this weekend will be still available on one if the many platforms I’ve been paying for.

    I’m just done with it.

  • Joe Bidet@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    All culture belongs to everyone, therefore should be accessible to everyone.

    The sale of goods only concerns those who can and want to afford it.

    Sharing is not theft.

    Pirates are cool.

    • OnopordumAcanthium@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dito. Mob Psycho is awesome, but if i want to buy all 3 seasons in HD i’d spending more than 100€ (on Blu-Ray). This is nothing but ridiculous.

  • JasSmith@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t pirate music or games because there are reasonable platforms and pricing models which make pirating more hassle than it’s worth. Shows and movies, on the other hand, are an absolute shitshow to purchase legally.

    • Outrageous pricing.

    • Declining quality. Especially writing. See Rings of Power, Wheel of Time, and Foundation.

    • Content is often unavailable to purchase. See Disney vault.

    • Competing streaming services. I’d have to subscribe to six services to access the shows I like.

    • Content disappears from services with little notice.

    • Studios and platforms have been removing and modifying older content for political reasons.

    It’s like they’re trying to make the experience as bad as possible. So fuck ‘em. Thank you Sonarr and Radarr.

    • thelastknowngod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t pirate music … because there are reasonable platforms and pricing models which make pirating more hassle than it’s worth.

      Hopefully Spotify is not the platform you’re talking about. I don’t use them because they do not pay the artists. Bandcamp is the spot for music… It’s really the only place I get music anymore.

      • JasSmith@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t use Spotify, but no one forces artists to list their music on Spotify. They can choose list on any platform they like. FYI Spotify does in fact pay artists. Just less than Bandcamp. Streaming is why I don’t pirate anymore. If I had to go back to paying $30 for an album I’d be a pirate again. So artists can take some of my money, or none of it.

    • Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It makes me so mad that company’s edit or change original movies or books for politcal or because it hurts somebody’s feelings. The movie/book was written or produced in a time period that was very different and its ugly to try to change history. If you don’t teach about the ugly things in history they are doomed to repeat themselfs

  • comfisofa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know how writers get paid fuck all for the movies they write? You know how animators are paid criminally low wages for the anime they produce? At the end of the day for most media it’s the companies that get all the money, not the artists. Therefore, fuck them, I am pirating your content not contributing to your profit margins.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    I only pirate TVs/Movies. Streaming is in such a shitty state that I don’t want to figure out what service is on what, and I’m certainly not going to subscribe for just one thing to watch. I feel no remorse.

  • HTTP_404_NotFound@lemmyonline.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I cannot confirm, nor deny.

    But, I will say, once upon a time, before the days of netflix, if you wanted to watch things, you needed to spend a fuckload of money, to watch it on cable, with commercials every 10 minutes… or, you drove to a blockbuster. So, you either did that, or you obtained the movie/tv/etc, via a torrent.

    Then, netflix came along, gave you a ton of content, at a reasonable price. And- then, there wasn’t really much of an advantage to obtaining media via other alternative means. So, netflix took over by storm, and piracy went way down.

    Then, everyone wanted a piece of the action. So, then Hulu, Netflix, Amazon Prime, Disney Plus, HBO+, ESPN+, (And insert 50 other network-specific streaming services) jumped into the fray. Then, they all made exclusive streaming contracts. So, if you watch a handful of things, you would need a handful of streaming service subscriptions.

    And- again, the alternative option of piracy, became the better option, as you can watch whatever the f- you want, WHENever you want, without having to pay for 50 different subscriptions every month, just to watch a TV series, which they decide to cancel after the 2nd season.

    Do you justify?

    If the fucking scumbags didn’t get greedy in the first place, we wouldn’t be in this situation. But, no, everyone wanted an extremely generous piece of the pie, and now everything has went to shit again. Fuck those guys. Isn’t like the actual actors/writers staring in movies gets any of the money anyways.

  • skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    If there was a service I could pay like $100-200/mo for and just have every movie and TV show I’d happily pay for it. It doesn’t exist, but pirate sites do and they do have every movie and TV show, including tons completely unavailable on any streaming service

    GabeN got it right, piracy is a service issue. I haven’t pirated a PC game in probably 12 years because steam works great and has basically every PC game I could ask for.

  • unfinished | 🇵🇸@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I pirate all media I consume and seed terabytes of pirated media every month, proudly. Fuck capitalism, that’s my justification.

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had to write a research report in university about whether or not piracy hurt or helped the recording industry.

    From the research, I found multiple studies that compared brain activity of shoplifters compared to those of pirates. The area of the brain that lit up when stealing physical objects did NOT light up for those who pirated.

    Digital piracy is not theft. No one is hurt except for unrealized revenue. But if someone pirates, was that even potential revenue to begin with?

    It was also found that piracy allowed for greater reach of content which statistically resulted in more people attending live concerts (think of piracy as free advertisement). Concert attendance led to increase in ticket and merchandise sales.

    So overall? Piracy is good. It is only bad if you ignore multiple factors and only focus on short term bottom lines. A net positive.

  • witchergeraltofrivia@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My time is more valuable than money, but I still pirate. To me it’s not about money but principles.
    If I pay for something and still can’t “own” it, I pirate.
    If a generous portion of the money I pay isn’t going to the rightful individuals but to our corporate overlords, I pirate.
    If my internet freedom is threatened, I pirate.

    If someone pirates due to lack of money and one day they have enough, I suggest keep pirating and donate to FOSS and pay to individual creators.