• barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Uh, yes, it is an argument, whether or not you want to close your eyes to reality. Billionaires do not occur without individuals using concentrations of capital or power to extract large amounts of value from laborers. The wealth inequality in China is very present, due to the fact that it is capitalism.

    You would do well to join the people capable of observing objective reality instead of scouring the web for essays that cite philosophers instead of data. That would require confronting your cognitive biases, though.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      They’re literally defending the existence of The People’s Billionaires as proletarian liberation. They’re a lost cause, like most tankies.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Totally agree. The essay they posted has some funny magical thinking if you want to skim through it for a laugh. “Billionaires are good actually because we need them to be like a sort of USB plug so we can link into capitalist economies. Anyway the state can execute them as a scapegoat if the need arises. Here’s a few dozen quotes from philosophers. See? Still socialist.”

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          As Mao also said, “let one hundred flowers bloom in social science and arts and let one hundred of view points be expressed in the field of science.”, and then promptly jailed and murdered those who expressed themselves. Not sure he’s the ideal champion of free thought.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Jailing reactionaries is objectively good, the Cultural Revolution just went a little too far (like the Great Purge before it).

            • mecfs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              You know. I imagine most tankies are just radicalised westerners.

              But you my friend, I would be willing to bet you’re a chinese state sponsered keyboard warrior.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Socialism is about control of the means of production.

        Oh, you’re closer to reality than I imagined. Ok, so the billionaires are receiving billions of dollars with whose means of production?

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Workers who own the means opt to force billions in wealth they generated upon these unfortunate individuals who must act as lightning rods for criticism. Instead of distributing it amongst themselves or spending on infrastructure. Very realistic perspective, thank you.

              • barsquid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                I believe it isn’t distributing the billions of yuan that are going to these individuals who own means of production, yes.

                  • barsquid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    This argument chain was on whether or not the proles are empowered under Chinese capitalism (they aren’t) not whether or not their standard of living is above $2/day.

                    Comparing to America is whataboutism but the numbers I am finding are under 0.25% US citizens below that extreme poverty level in 2020 compared to 0.7% Chinese citizens in 2015.

                    Sus when you look at real numbers instead of just patting yourself on the back with citations that agree with you.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Socialism is not about wealth inequality. Socialism is about control of the means of production.

        “Chinese billionaires are just really well paid proletarians” said no one sane ever.