• Rooki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    That was sadly the point why we didnt recognized that as feedback, rather as just being childish because some site said some bad things about their favorite news page.

    At least we got some real feedback that were constructive. We will implement those and deploy it.

      • Rooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        3 months ago

        “MBFC BAD DESTROY IT” isnt valid. Its just personal opinion. We responded to the real feedback accordingly and will implement them soon.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ah yes, I’m sure that was exactly how every piece of feedback against mbfc was.

          • Rooki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            3 months ago

            No of course not, some were constructive and gave an alternative site or adjusted format how they expect it to look.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          I know you really don’t want to be shipped off to the work camps but that’s not really feedback is it?

          Now where do you want us to paint the bus a different color?

          Yes. Yes. I’m being facetious but… Like only accepting nice things that maybe fix appearance as feedback? Pshh.

    • CaliforniaKove@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Please be honest with yourself. Feedback that isn’t complimentary of your closed-source bot has consistently been disregarded, even when it was constructive

      • Rooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        3 months ago

        No, there was some good. Feedback, those “I HATE MBFC DESTROY IT” Feedback was not constructive.

        • CaliforniaKove@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          Your definition of feedback, as stated in one of your latest posts —“No improvement idea? No… that’s NOT feedback, that’s just crying around”(https://lemmy.ca/post/25936280/10720168)— is clearly out of touch with reality and reflects a biased and distorted view. Feedback includes all types of input, not just suggestions for improvement.

          • Rooki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            3 months ago

            I just reflect how it feels to get such bad feedback without any real feedback in it.

            Feedback includes many types of input but not: Disliking it because of personal opinion, because service x rated your favorite news page badly.

            My feedback to that emotional feedback was just my emotion back to it.

            If we wanted everyones opinion on MBFC yes then we would loved this response from you. But feedback is not just MBFC BAD!!!

            What if theoretically give you feedback on your math test: “0 Points Because ITS BAD!!!” Then you would think why was it bad? The formula ? The results? The readability? Or were my books that i read bad?

            • Zoot@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Normally when faced with simply “its bad!!!” You reflect. If i got a 0 on my math score with no explanation id imagine I did so insanely bad, that I need to rethink how I did it entirely.

              Maybe stop removing comments and see about finding better sources, that also happen to reflect what your users want.

              • Rooki@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                3 months ago

                I did not remova any comments? Those removed comments are renoved by mods of the community.

                But the issue is there is no other alternative that has an ordered and automatable access.

                Then the other option was to have a community made “source” but that brings up the issue with “User x is not fit to contribute”, “Remove the bad rating on site xyz.com” etc. tadah back to the start with the “crying” ablut topic x.

                We are still working on such an system as this could at least reduce the shitstorm about having no option to alter the rating. But its not final that decision.

                • Krauerking@lemy.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Notice how it’s people in the comments that seem to take issue with this? Like the ones actually where it is?

                  Your insisting it’s needed from a silent vote with no voice?

                  Maybe just fricking hold a poll?