Anti-trans organizations have said that their position against gender affirming care center on “protecting kids.” Now, a Florida judge has allowed them to proceed with their next target: trans adults.


Several weeks ago, a federal judge in Florida halted a ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth, declaring it likely unconstitutional. Yet, transgender adults were also heavily impacted by the law: 80% of gender-affirming care providers for trans adults in the state were forced to stop. Consequently, many found themselves forced to flee the state, temporarily or permanently, in order to access care. Those forced to stay clung to the hope that the provisions targeting them might also be overruled. However, those hopes suffered a setback when the 11th Circuit Court determined that discriminating against transgender individuals in healthcare would be allowed, at least in the short term. Relying on this verdict, the Florida Judge Monday declined to block the sections affecting trans adult care. Now, the precedent has been set for adult care bans, a stark contradiction to some anti-trans activists’ assurances that their sole aim was to “protect children.”

Earlier this year, Florida passed SB254. The bill did not only prohibit gender-affirming care for transgender youth, but also casted stringent requirements for care on trans adults. Specifically, the laws bars nurse practitioners from administering care and mandates that providers distribute inaccurate medical forms, laden with misleading narratives, suggesting treatments are experimental. This was a substantial change, as the vast amount of trans adult care is provided by nurse practitioners. A representative from a clinic in the state, SPEKTRUM Health, estimated that 80% of such care would be affected. Further, the new informed consent form dictates a pre-requisite of “social support” before a trans individual embarks on care, despite many trans adults losing social support from their families after they transition. Though the initial discussion centered on the effect of the bill on trans youth, trans adults across the state suddenly saw their prescriptions dropped by their providers as a result.


read more: https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/no-longer-about-kids-florida-judge

  • GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the people want a different system what is the justice in forcing them to maintain a system that does not work for them? Why should the jackboot of the socialist state crush the desires if the people should they desire something new?

    Nothing would happen to me if I advocate for the overthrow if Im not advocating for violence. In the USA there have been communists running that advocated the removal and replacement of the government. There even is a specific right to completely replace the government in the constitution.

    • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If the people want a different system what is the justice in forcing them to maintain a system that does not work for them?

      But they don’t, so there is justice in maintaining that system against a small amount of dissidents and foreign sabotage.

      Nothing would happen to me if I advocate for the overthrow if Im not advocating for violence.

      Historically this is how black communists get bullets and white communists get prison cells.

      There even is a specific right to completely replace the government in the constitution.

      And remind me of the mechanism, and how it doesn’t involve forces that are invested in the status quo?

      • GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In my hypothetical situation they do want the change and right now you cannot even suggest that due to the authoritarian structure of the state.

          • GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok and what if down the road the government gives way to severe corruption and no longer represents the people and they want a change?

            The fact is Cuba is authoritarian because the mechanisms to remove the government do jot exist and the people have no say in the direction unless they agree with the state.

            • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ok and what if down the road the government gives way to severe corruption and no longer represents the people and they want a change?

              The exact same as any country where the government is severely corrupt and doesn’t represent the people; it must be forcefully overthrown.

              Cuba is authoritarian because the mechanisms to remove the government do jot exist

              That’s literally every country

              the people have no say in the direction unless they agree with the state.

              I thought we were talking about Cuba, not the USA.

              • GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You might want to read the US Constitution as it literally has mechanisms for the removal of the entire government. Im bringing that up as a point because you are completely incorrect that “every” country has this.

                We are talking about Cuba when we talk about how only people who agree with the state can run as in the USA there are socialists running who want to completely change our political structure. You can’t do that in Cuba and that is why is is authoritarian and the USA is currently not .

    • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nothing would happen to me if I advocate for the overthrow if Im not advocating for violence. In the USA there have been communists running that advocated the removal and replacement of the government. There even is a specific right to completely replace the government in the constitution

      Pure galaxy-brain centrist

      • GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We literally have had candidates suggesting this who were not killed.

        Sorry to burst your bubble but it is legal and possible in the USA.

        • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          No one cares if you have the right to impotently suggest it. If you actually make a serious attempt to do it though you’re getting Fred Hamptoned.

          • GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fred Hampton advocated violent revolution which has nothing to do with why he was murdered. Hampton was murdered because he effectively organized non-white neighborhoods and the LEO couldn’t handle that.

      • GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What if the government ceases to be socialist due to corruption should the people not be able to correct that?

        What if they decide they don’t want to be socialist because it doesn’t work for the majority?

        Authoritarianism is never a positive situation in governance.

          • GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No it’s a well defined concept in political philosophy. If you can’t speak against the government, you cannot suggest changing the type of government, or if power is trapped within hereditary lines then the state is authoritarian.

            Whether the authoritarian system is worse than a non-authoritarian state is a different matter. Cuba has benefitted significantly from their authoritarian government as has China and Vietnam. Authoritarian does not always mean the government is bad it just means the population is less free which they might not care about.