• MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    An ideology has to evolve over time in order to remain relevant to the generations that come and go from time to time. If you don’t do that, you will stagnate with a small group of people.

    To gather more people, you have to find a common ground of the groups that are marginalized from society at that time, and you have to lead them to achieve that goal.

      • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        They should have a Marxist ideology that is friendly to a large part of the population or marginalized groups in order to achieve relevance.

        Adapt new technologies to their ideology and not come into conflict.

        • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          The word ‘Marxism’ means five different things in five different fields. You’ll need to be clearer about what exactly you feel should change.

          From what I understand, the core ideas of Marxism - the ones about epistemiology, metaphysics, sociology and history - are more or less universally accepted in those fields (to the point that a student of, say, history may learn Marx’s theories as revealed truth, without even questioning them). His writings on economics are controversial, but again the core of it has remained largely unchanged.

          Also, Marx thought of sociology, economics and so on as sciences, meaning that a theory is either right or wrong (or partially right). How many people believe in them has no effect on their truth value. So I don’t get what you mean by an ‘ideology that is friendly to a large part of the population or marginalized groups’.