• Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    CNN is allowed under R2 as long as it is pro-conservative or . Talking about Elon and his finances is not pro-conservative, nor is it anti-liberal. There are plenty of other places for you to talk about Elon. The topic isn’t relevant to the spirit of R2.

    You also posted that Kamala Harris is not in line with R2.

    I have had this conversation with you ad nauseam, and I will not repeat myself constantly. I will delete the offending material and go on with life.

    I will repost rule 2 to allow you to read and digest it again.

    We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

    As you will note, CNN as a source of information is fine as long as it is pro-conservative. If you think one of the mods will delete it, it is best to post an explanation as to how it is pro-conservative or showing a liberal bias.

    • TruffleStuff@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias

      … according to wintermute. Maybe it’s not so clear to the rest of us where the boundaries lie.

      • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That’s exactly my point. He’s just selecting the level of bias that’s acceptable based on the article title and his reaction to it. His response to me indicates as much. For example, that Kamala post wasn’t about Kamala. For the third time, it was a running ticker of election-related stories, some conservative and some not so much, but if Wintermute actually read the comment on my post he would see I acknowledged that and stated my intentions for making such a post.

        It seems here that if a post is “not conservative enough”, you risk getting banned. That’s no way to foster an actual community, or encourage good faith discussion.