• hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I actually don’t know nearly enough about OS design, and I’ve been toying with the idea of learning more for like 20 years now but never manage to get around to it. How’s that book hold up, considering it was (apparently?) published in '96? I’d assume a lot of the basics are still the same, and since it’s a book about the “evolution” of UNIX the historical parts will still be interesting in any case

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The design of the BSD operating system is more narrative friendly, easier to read just for fun

      Unix internals keeps getting updates, but is far more technically applied. And probably easier to become outdated.

      From a philosophy perspective both books are great but if you could only read one I would recommend the BSD book. I know the Linux kernel and the BSD kernel have divergent development, but as far as posix structures are concerned they’re pretty similar

      • Juno@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ll set aside a whole day for you to talk about me not liking Linus tech tips if you like.

        Let’s dive deep!

        • UlrikHD@programming.dev
          shield
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Please refrain from harassing our users, keep whatever argument you have contained to the thread it started. Following and harassing users across communities/instances is not tolerated.

          You will only be given a temporary ban of one week from our instance, but if it continues after that it will changed to a permanent ban.