• RoosterBoy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Well then they are sexist. Why does the man have to be the offensive fighter? Is Ubisoft implying men are violent and can’t be sneaky? They also seem to be implying women can’t be strong and defend themselves.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d argue it’s less sexism and more following a cliche. It’s a way more pervasive pattern than you likely expect. It’s so common that TV Tropes has an entire page for it, or the general dynamic, at least. Sure, the cliche is sexist, but it’s also one of those things that people will unconsciously default to even when they know it’s a thing.