• Lightor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean you can tell me what I support and what I don’t understand all you want. I %100 agree with full body autonomy. I have a hunch you just see too black and white to understand the nuance I tried to highlight.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m the one trying to highlight nuance, you’re the one trying to insist everything’s black and white.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes, the “No you are.” I’m in favor of %100 body autonomy, what nuance am I missing?

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          100% absolute body autonomy would mean consent doesn’t have to be informed. That’s the meaning of the word “absolute.”

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I agree, it doesn’t have to be. But if you want assistance, that assistance can inform you before assisting. You can inject bleach at home, but a doctor doesn’t have to do it for you. Your autonomy does not obligate others to act and it doesn’t prevent them from giving you information.

            So yeah, I’m %100 for it still. How exactly do I not understand?

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Ok great, then people can commit suicide at home but that doesn’t compel anyone to act to assist them. Looks like my stance is fully consistent with bodily autonomy and your objection is meaningless.