• Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Well, yes, but in a broader sense, they have way too much of a stake in the control of global communications altogether. Even just a hiccup on their servers or slight change to their system has a global impact, as obviously evidenced here. The world is dangerously reliant on a centralized private company for daily functioning.

    Such a powerful entity shouldn’t be controlled by private parties and needs to be governed in a way that the benefit of the people is kept paramount.

      • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not really anything to do but draw attention to it… It’s not like we have an effective globally governing body to oversee something like this objectively.

        • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          No, i meant what solution would you like to see here.

          Like just taking the business away from the company and have the government seize it?

          Because other than just building a new one that organically grows and becomes better, then I don’t see a solution.

          Maybe regulate the hell out of it, but that’s basically just seizing it and forcing them to do what you want.

          I do agree it is a precarious situation though

          • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I mean, I’m a fan of regulatory action, in the same vein as what was proposed with net neutrality originally, and dissolution of the monopoly. The services Google provides are vital to the functioning of the internet, and as such, must be treated as a governed utility the same way internet provision should be, with tight definitions of services and regulations to control what can be done and when. In that regard, companies like Google and Amazon(in regard to AWS) would be classified as utility providers similar to ISPs with the same degree of accountability in regard to service provision, availability, transparency of policy and actions, liability, etc.

            In addition, break up the monopoly accordingly. Entertainment services, telephony/internet/communication services, electronics development, however it would be appropriate. Problem is how many of those services overlap and likely where they’d argue that the company can’t be broken up.

            Like you said, that’s like seizing their business from them and it also doesn’t account for global factors. However, each nation is ultimately responsible for how companies operate within their borders, internet service providers should be no different.

            • tedu@azorius.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              So what should a regulated search utility do about SEO spam? Maybe publish an open source algorithm so I can test my spam before submitting it?