• Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Quiet quitting has always referred to the extra bullshit that employers pressure employees into doing.

    In America we’ve fallen into this work culture that implies you aren’t really part of a team unless you are constantly putting forth more than what the employer is paying you for.

    The undertone of this headline is that managers feel uneasy because so-called “quiet quitters” won’t take on extra work or unpaid hours or exhibit overwhelming enthusiasm, but just do literally what they have to at a passable or high quality.

    The gaslighting part is that those workers aren’t doing anything wrong, but they aren’t bending over backwards for their employers, so corporate America wants to paint the picture that those workers are awful time thieves instead of just burnt out wage slaves.

    • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 months ago

      I hear some countries in Asia are CRAZY bad for these kind of expectations and have been for a long time.

      • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        6 months ago

        Oh absolutely. In Japan for example if you are unable to work or you get removed from your career, it is socially understandable for you to consider suicide. Lots of Japanese citizens put their job before even their families or the potential of having a family.

        It’s actually pretty fuckin crazy what Japanese work culture does to their citizens.

        • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’ve been reading Graeber’s Bullshit Jobs and evidently they don’t fire people in Japan. If they want rid of you, they just give you less and less to do until you’re sitting in the office all day getting paid to do nothing, and the cultural expectation is that you quit out of shame rather than just accepting money for nothing.

            • lightnegative@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              It only works for cultures where individuals have to sepukku if they bring shame on family.

              In the USA, bringing shame upon family is considered a rite of passage so it doesn’t quite have the same effect

              • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                Heh. I already am that, but I do have to work. It’s not as hard as when I was digging ditches for a living, but it’s definitely still work. Sometimes it’s slow, sometimes there’s a million things to do.

                • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I’ll be honest, I don’t know if I have to work. I do, because I like the work and I like the company I work for a lot, but I’m fairly confident that I could just show up to meetings twice a week and fudge paperwork for quite a while before anyone caught on that I’m just a hole they’re dumping money into.

          • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I wonder if this also has something to do with the company itself avoiding shame too. Like firing an employee is a sign of weakness, that you hired someone like that in the first place? Or potentially a difference in benefits or a pension that they have to pay?

            • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              That’s a thought I had as well, and based on my extremely limited knowledge and research I think it’s the conflict that’s being avoided. Rather than dealing with the person directly, you use indirect actions that signal the expected result when taken in that social context and then let the pressure of those expectations generate the result you need without you ever directly doing anything. My understanding is that the pressure is pretty enormous, your coworkers will basically shun you out of fear of being targeted themselves and resentment for all the work you’re not doing that they have to pick up instead.

      • Drusas@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Look up China’s 669 practice. South Korea is also known for having an especially brutal work culture. The two manage to make even Japan’s work culture look almost reasonable by comparison (Japan famously requiring long hours and lifelong dedication to your employer).