• R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Hey, we saved money by computerization, so we’re gonna pass that cost onto you!”

      “Don’t you mean ‘pass the savings onto us?’”

      :D “Nope!”

      • kevin2107@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly they probably spend so much on devs to maintain their website that they don’t break even lmao

        • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The amount you’d save not hiring physical ticket sales workers would absolutely dwarf any amount of possible dev salaries for one website.

          • kautau@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lol in my local cinema I have to use a computer next to the ticket taker to print my ticket I bought online and then they physically look at it to tell me which theatre I should walk to, it’s like Idiocracy’s costco

    • Dempf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nothing, it’s just an extra charge so that the company can make more money.

    • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nothing for the customer. It’s just convenient for the theater to charge more for the ticket.

    • ReaderTunesOctopus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Answer from another: nothing. We also have them in various places, like parking, or highway vignettes - you are not using their facilities, you save them money, so they charge you some extra

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    … and on top of that you have to watch like ten minutes’ worth of ads at the beginning. Ugh.

  • donut4ever@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Serious question, wtf is a convenience fee? There needs to be a law for companies to explain wtf these things are.

    • LetMeEatCake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Convenience fee is the best name they can apply to soften a fee, which is really just a way for them to charge more than the list price.

      Fees should be universally folded into the list price by default.

      • donut4ever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s fucking disgusting. TMobile does this shit, too with their “other fees”. My gym does this with a $27 a year “maintenance fee”. Like wtf is this?

        • SixTrickyBiscuits@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You might be seeing fees I’m not, but some cell service are actually mandatory in the US. Usually a few dollars a month, they go to various state and federal agencies.

          • donut4ever@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t know. I don’t mind the fee if it’s small, but at least give a name that shows it’s justified. “other fees” doesn’t mean shit

  • Infinitenonblondes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I saw Indiana Jones today it had 25 minutes of trailers, an admonishment to not ruin the movie, Nicole Kidman telling me how great going to the movies is, and a commercial for the projector. So a movie listed to start at 11 started at 11:28. it’s fucking ridiculous.

    • scoops@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find that pretty consistent for AMC. What ever the listed time is the film will play after 30min of trailers/promos. Its annoying but easy to plan around.

    • Bear@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I got a $600 projector and have about 90 inch display ( can hit 120 if my apartment was bigger). No need to go to a cinema, overpay for drinks and snacks, and I can pause and pee whenever I want.

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a very good setup at home but we still like going to the cinema once in a while, it’s more of an event and we don’t spend the movie with our nose in our phones.

      We do select movies where it’s worth it, big action, etc. Last one was the new avatar in “4D” where they splash you with sprays, the seats move and you feel the wind, pretty cool.

      • christophski@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe you should have a no phones rule when you watch a movie at home? Seems like a good idea otherwise what’s the point of watching

  • generalpotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For a family of 4 which includes 2 adults and 2 children, we’re looking at $100 for tickets and snacks easily. It’s crazy how expensive going to the movies have become. That said, I really like recliner seats + Dolby Atmos without having to worry about “getting the best seats”, so some of the hike is a little more digestible. Movie theater snacks though, now that’s highway robbery.

  • ampedwolfman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Have to hit the matinees. I take my son to a nearby movie theatre that has a full bar/menu and the tickets for he and I to go are around or under $20 for both of us. It’s like $9.25 per person.

  • SojournerWeaver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I go to the movies at least once a week. This is one of the few cases where the subscription is where it’s at. 25 dollars a month gets me three movies a week. I usually only see one but that nearly pays for itself the first week. It’s great!

  • iByteABit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why you should support any surviving local theaters that aren’t chains. Monopolies aren’t created solely by the companies but with the help of the consumers too

  • BestBouclettes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    We have some cinemas around here that offer an unlimited option. For a set monthly fee, you can go to the cinema as much as you want. Obviously you have to pay for all the extras (3D, popcorn and stuff). I have one and I go to the movies like 3 times a month on average.

  • zav@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    20$ is a joke.

    I remember when Tickets were 5-10$ at most not even that long ago, wtf happened