Biden is such a liar

  • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    False. Already cited otherwise.

    You claim to want a discussion but really what you want is agreement with your false ideas.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        You ssnt to believe Trump made fun of a disabled person. It’s important for you to believe that. It bothers you that I look at the facts and don’t see the delusion. I just see Trump doing exactly what he’s done for years.

        I find it more entertaining you see something that isn’t there and keep insisting it’s true.

        • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          He clearly mocked a disabled person. I’m not arguing that with you anymore. It’s in the video, clear as any other video. It’s your choice to pretend not to see it.

          You’re just having to justify to yourself that isn’t what happened so you can’t be wrong.

          Its reasons like this that explain perfectly why you get more dissent than agreement in this community. At least in past exchanges I’ve owned up when I was wrong and apologized. You so far have been incapable of that.

            • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              An opinion article on a conservative site is not making any points in your favor and the fact that you think that it’s enough to debunk a video of the thing actually happening is honestly really sad.

              With as much as you like to trash talk liberals I would expect better debate skills from you. But I guess this is just how conservatives form arguments.

              If I were to provide an opinion article from a liberal publication saying the exact opposite, would that then fully cancel out your point and put us back at square one? Or would you just continue denying the world around you?