• IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Shitty headline. Their concern is that there’s no way for a 3rd party app to disable the mic on iPhones. They’re not worried about iOS being insecure, just that if someone wanted to use one to record sensitive conversations, there’s no way they can stop that happening.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m surprised microphone and camera privileges aren’t part of any device management software.

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Funnily enough, it’s because of Apple’s approach to security. There’s no API available for 3rd party software to use because if there was, some asshole would find a way to abuse it.

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The headline is technically correct. They are worried over iPhones being used in a manner that affects the security of the military base.

    • Xatolos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      but also informal communications such as private phone calls (within military buildings).

      They are worried about iOS being insecure as it’s been shown time and time again that iOS devices keep getting hacked and this kind of thing happens. Here is the latest issue with it from 12 days ago.

      When dealing with the military, you need to make sure your devices are secure, not “well basic users most likely couldn’t break into it.”

      Now, the title is terrible because it does point out later in the article that many devices will be banned, so it’s most likely not just iPhones, but also off the shelf Samsung phones as well. They will most likely want a secure smartphone like a Samsung Tactical Edition smartphone, as those are secure and have military designs.

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        IIRC they added the album to everyone’s iTunes accounts without asking, I guess if a user had automatic downloads enabled they would’ve downloaded it without giving permission. It was a dick move.

        They can’t “push whatever they want” though.

        • MrShankles@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Except the “ownership” of a U2 album I guess. Was it an “opt-in” situation, or did people just suddenly own a U2 album?

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I didn’t think you understand how the military views security. It is not the same way you or I do.