A judge in Washington state has blocked video evidence that’s been “AI-enhanced” from being submitted in a triple murder trial. And that’s a good thing, given the fact that too many people seem to think applying an AI filter can give them access to secret visual data.

  • Meowing Thing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Aren’t we already in a kind of dark age?

    People denying science, people scared of diseases and vaccination, people using anything AI or blockchain as if it were magic, people defending power-hungry, all-promising dictators, people divided over and calling the other side barbaric. And of course, wars based on religion.

    Seems to me we’re already in the dark.

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Aren’t we already in a kind of dark age?

      A bit over 150 years ago, slavery was legal (and commonplace) in the United States.

      Sure, lots of shitty stuff in the world today… but you don’t have to go far back to a time when a sherif with zero evidence relying on unverified accusations and heresy would’ve put up a “wanted dead or alive” poster with a drawing of the guy’s face created by an artist who had never even laid eyes on the alleged murderer.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Well, the dark ages came after the late antiquity where slavery was normal. And it took a few centuries for slavery to die out in European societies, though serfdom remained which wasn’t too different. And then serfdom in England formally existed even in XIXth century. I’m not talking about Russia, of course, where it played the same role as slavery in the US south.

        EDIT: What I meant - this is more about knowledge and civilization, not good and bad. Also 150 years is too much, but compared to 25 years ago - I think things are worse in many regards.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh for sure. We are already in a period that will have some fancy name in future anthropology studies but the question is how far down do we still have to go before we see any light.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Aren’t we already in a kind of dark age?

      In the sense of actually making things in the backbone of our civilization becoming a process and knowledge heavily centralized and removed from most people living their daily lives, yes.

      Via many small changes we’ve come to the situation where everybody uses Intel and AMD or other very complex hardware, directly or in various mechanisms, which requires infrastructure and knowledge more expensive than most nation-states to produce.

      People no more can make a computer usable for our daily processes via soldering something together using TTL logic and elements bought in a radio store, and we could perform many tasks via such computers, if not for network effect. We depend on something even smart people can’t do on their own, period.

      It’s like tanks or airplanes or ICBMs.

      A decent automatic rifle or grenade or a mortar can well be made in a workshop. Frankly even an alternative to a piece of 50s field artillery can be, and the ammunition.

      What we depend on in daily civilian computing is as complex as ICBMs, and this knowledge is even more sparsely distributed in the society than the knowledge of how ICBMs work.

      And also, of course, the tendency for things to be less repairable (remember the time when everything came with manuals and schematics?) and for people to treat them like magic.

      This is both reminiscent of Asimov’s Foundation (only there Imperial machines were massive, while Foundation’s machines were well miniaturized, but the social mechanisms of the Imperial decay were described similarly) and just psychologically unsettling.