• BaronDoggystyleVonWoof@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You don’t even need to have super rich parents. My mother helped me get my first home with 15K that she saved throughout the years. (I paid her back).

    That was just enough for my down payment. Without that I couldn’t have gotten the house.

    • los_chill@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So your house was somewhere in the 75k to 150k range? Average home prices where I live and work are 800k. That would mean a down-payment of 80k to 160k. You would absolutely “need to have super rich parents” to get that kind of help. I’m happy for you that you were able to secure a home of your own with the help of family. That just isn’t a simple reality for most most people who don’t have super wealthy parents where I am from.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You only need 3% of the loan for a down-payment. That would be $500k assuming OP did not add anything in.

        My parents helped my wife and I a bit. I grew up in a 1000 sqft house with 2-3 other siblings. I do, however recognize that not everyone’s parents were lucky enough to have that much stashed away but should still have the opportunity to purchase a home.

        • predictable_territory@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s true in the US, but depends heavily on the country: if you’re buying in London, you only need 5% as a general rule, but other regulations push the average down payment to about 14% before purchasing is on the table. In the Netherlands, from my understanding, you wouldn’t need a down payment at all.

      • Novman@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m italian and here in 800k dollars is a very big house in a very good place. Or a good apartment in a big city. Your salaries are so good? I mean here median salary is like 1.9k dollars/ month ( after taxes and health insurance ). Your salary after taxes and insurance should be 6-8k dollars/month for a normal job. You have such high salaries?

        • Harvey656@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          800k is a pretty damn nice place unless you live in a super high cost of living place where it may only get you a decent place.

        • RBWells@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, we probably have a bigger gap between housing cost and worker pay. In my area:

          Median household income $61k/year last year (per household not person)

          Median price of a house that same year was apparently $400k. Including those way far away from the city. In my average but in the city neighborhood new builds are going for close to a million and older houses about 400k.

          Median rent monthly here is an eye watering $2,350.

          • Novman@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            In italy is 30k, median price of one house is , i think between 100k and 200k ( apartment ). One million here you buy a 4000 sq.ft. indipendent house with garden in one of the best city places near downtown. ( btw we have a greater people density, so land here costs much more than in usa ).

            2350 month… You rent a mansion. Btw we have no so much new houses. The cities are way older. The maximum price is for ancient reinessance palace with ancient frescoes or roman ruins included. They are selling a palace ( 10000 sq.ft. ) with reinessance frescoes that need a lot of work ( so i think 1 million more to renewate it ) for 2 millions.

            Yes, the pay is an half. But the house prices are quite cheaper ( but the houses are smaller , 1800 sq.ft. apartment, 270k $. But if you need less space you can find for less than 100k.

            • RBWells@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes I think the big problem here (right here, maybe not USA as a whole) is there is no more little cheap places to buy, and the apartments for rent, they do not care if vacant - if they have 100 units and could rent them all out for $1k/month or rent half for $3k, they raise rent to $3k and leave half of them empty.

              I think median pay for one worker is around $40k but many households have more than one worker.

              • Novman@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You have really high property taxes, they cost as much as a rent in my country ( we have property taxes here, too, but not so high ) , it is impossible to rent something 1k/ month if fixed taxes are 400 or 800 / month. Your corporation have too much money to settle ( cause over evaluation of stocks ) and you goverment taxes too much houses ( cause corporations pay too low taxes ).

                • RBWells@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m in Florida and sales tax is high (not as high as most European VAT but high) and property tax high because they like to say “no state income tax” . Though if the house is your home, not an investment, it’s lower and the yearly increase capped at 3% no matter the value assessment . And yes we bought a house and about 1/3 of the monthly cost is taxes and property insurance. And yes - corporations here and the richest families pay not enough. But with property taxes at least corporations & landlords do pay higher rate than homeowners (that is a part of why rents have increased, the skyrocketing property values. But most of that increase is greed, profit). So if one actually can buy the apartment the property taxes will not be so bad over time, even if the value shoots up, and will come down if value drops.

                  It’s complicated but I think the main issues are greed and to some extent zoning & land use patterns - not so much inside the city - we have a good mix of houses, apartments, businesses, but so much land used for sprawling suburbs not more compact development, and that’s expensive in a lot of ways.

                  • Novman@feddit.it
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    So with your rent you pay income taxes for the richest…

                    This is the reason in italy a lot of people oppose the transfer of taxation from income to property. If i gain a lot of money i will pay more taxes, but if i have a bad moment , i will be able to not sell my house or pay a rent. And my capital in real estate will be not slashed by taxes/expenses.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Borrowed 3k from my bad didn’t have to pay back. There is nothing wrong with getting help from family to buy a home. Fuck this article. The housing issue is caused by large corporations who are buying up all the houses along with interest rates keeping average person from buying a home.

      • pokemaster787@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is nothing wrong with getting help from family to buy a home.

        It is indicative of a problem that nearly half of home buyers have to. And indicative that we are possibly heading in a direction where only those with familial wealth will own housing. This is objectively a problematic direction.

        Also, yes, if it’s some absurd amount like $200k borrowed, nepotism is the right word. A couple grand may not be a lot to you, but there are places where it is as well. I know for a fact plenty of people from my hometown would struggle to loan their child even a couple thousand to buy a home. But the child is stuck paying rent that’s more than a mortgage, keeping them from savings up for said down payment. The fact we can’t save money is a problem, and parents giving their children money to buy a house just masks the issue except for those without that money.

        • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re not wrong but again it because of greedy corruption and corporations buying our politicians.

          Until we rise up and demand better it going get worse. Unfortunately we can’t band together when 40 to 50% of Americans like the boot on their necks. Long as it hurts others too.

    • rich@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not enough now, here in the UK at least

      Single 35yo. Earning alright. Mortgage on a 160k flat required a £90k deposit. Was a fucking nightmare, but at least I got it locked in at 4%

      • Mugly12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is not true, there are programs and different types of loans where you can buy a house with as little as 3% down payment.

        • DancingYetiCrab@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes but if you don’t qualify for a special program you are only seeing a 3% down payment with an exceptionally high interest rate and significant PMI. Which makes it even more unaffordable. That might help recent high income earners with little savings but again makes it difficult for average people with average savings.