• bastion@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    You do have a right to be alive, if you can gather the food to put in your mouth and get shelter (in most climates), and defend yourself from predators.

    ‘Earning a living’ is just some way people can do that. But you still need to defend against the predators.

    • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Take your eugenics pseudoscience bullshit and shove it up your ass.

      There is no if. We’re a social species, if everyone thought like you, people like Stephen Hawking would have never lived a full life.

      We lose so many good people to the “earn it” mentality.

      Babies don’t come out the womb walking. Nor are people born with the ability to hunt. Everything you have was given to you by another. Your mother didn’t ask you to earn it until you could, and whether or not people can is largely determined by their environment.

      Not to mention, how fucking arrogant do you have to be to demand someone earn the right to live? Who do you think you are, God?

      And then there is the little problem of capitalism rewarding people who “earned it” who are actually bad for society. Unless you think people like Biden and Trump somehow are more competent than most people? Both are rich and powerful people. Yet one is a genocidal asshole and the other is a con man. You’d have to be crazy to think they earned their power. I’d wager there are many homeless people that do less harm to the world than either.

      • bastion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Take your eugenics pseudoscience bullshit and shove it up your ass.

        How very rational and social of you to make assumptions about what I’m saying and to attack me based on that. Shall we move on?

        There is no if. We’re a social species, if everyone thought like you, people like Stephen Hawking would have never lived a full life.

        Firstly - you’re making a lot of assumptions about how I think. Secondly - this is like those billboards that say “This baby was destined to cure cancer, but she was aborted.” It has no merit. What happened in reality was, in a world where there are constraints on available energy, some people took care of Stephen Hawking (which is great). I have no problem with that. But those people are not obligated to. They did so for their own reasons, and we’re all the richer for it.

        Had they been forced to, that would simply be slavery.

        We lose so many good people to the “earn it” mentality.

        Perhaps that is because it’s an important facet of life. While not the only facet, it’s an important one. If you deny that, it will simply continue happening, only you’ll feel violated by its existence. If you accept it, you can see that it has areas of applicability, and areas where it’s not applicable. …and the whole us-vs-them fuck-the-man bullshit goes right out the window, along with the whole ‘fuck everyone else, it’s all cold and hard, i’m just gonna get mine’ bullshit.

        Babies don’t come out the womb walking. Nor are people born with the ability to hunt. Everything you have was given to you by another. Your mother didn’t ask you to earn it until you could, and whether or not people can is largely determined by their environment.

        Absolutely. We all stand on the foundations that have been created by others and by fundamental processes. If we don’t care for others, we lose not just the capacity to pass on what we have built and learned, but also some pretty core stuff that makes the human experience worthwhile.

        However, the underlying processes of life and death, of energy requirements, and of rational necessity also cannot be denied without paying a huge cost in quality of life, and in life itself.

        Not to mention, how fucking arrogant do you have to be to demand someone earn the right to live? Who do you think you are, God?

        I make no demands. I simply state what the underlying reality is. To me, it looks like you are subject to the requirement that you must “earn a living”, or have someone earn a living for you - regardless of whether you are a human in a capitalist society, a socialist one, or one that accepts or denies your sovereignty. Hell, you could even be a plant, and you’d still have to do the things required for survival. One way people think of that is ‘earning a living.’ But, of course, you can think of it (or not) however makes you happy.

        And then there is the little problem of capitalism rewarding people who “earned it” who are actually bad for society. Unless you think people like Biden and Trump somehow are more competent than most people? Both are rich and powerful people. Yet one is a genocidal asshole and the other is a con man. You’d have to be crazy to think they earned their power. I’d wager there are many homeless people that do less harm to the world than either.

        I don’t think they earned their power. I think they are examples of the way in which our current systemic principles are failing. As our principles fail (all do at some point), they start to leak power, which gets snapped up by whatever form of life (like genocidal assholes and conmen) that is willing to seize that power niche. But, they are like starving people, fighting for scraps rather than ensuring there will be food. Or like drowning people, pulling down anyone who tries to help. I can’t really blame them - that’s the situation they were put into - but I definitely wouldn’t back them. Better to do things a way that does work.

        • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Had they been forced to, that would simply be slavery.

          Having a mutual obligation to care for others in your community is exactly the same as being rounded up at gunpoint, ripped from your homeland, shipped to a field or a mine halfway across the world, and forced to toil all day every day for barely enough to survive on until you inevitably succumb to the horrible conditions inflicted upon you

          It is difficult for me to imagine what “personal liberty” is enjoyed by an unemployed person, who goes about hungry, and cannot find employment. Real liberty can exist only where exploitation has been abolished, where there is no oppression of some by others, where there is no unemployment and poverty, where a man is not haunted by the fear of being tomorrow deprived of work, of home and of bread. Only in such a society is real, and not paper, personal and every other liberty possible.

          -J. Stalin

          • bastion@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Having a mutual obligation to care for others in your community is exactly the same as being rounded up at gunpoint, ripped from your homeland, shipped to a field or a mine halfway across the world, and forced to toil all day every day for barely enough to survive on until you inevitably succumb to the horrible conditions inflicted upon you

            Oh, you’re just insane. I’m done here.

    • exocrinous@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Gee, I thought our standards of living had raised since the hunter gatherer days. I thought we had an idea of human rights. But it seems that advocates of capital like yourself are more willing to let the disabled die than most hunter gatherer tribespeople would be. All our wealth, and you people are more miserly with it than those who have nearly nothing.

      • bastion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Our standards of living have increased, and that’s nice. But there is no question of whether or not anyone deserves to live. You simply live, until you don’t, like all life.

        The increase in standards of living isn’t because we have eradicated the underlying animal needs, but rather, because we have been meeting them effectively. Sadly, this is only in the short term - we have major species-wide issues with our long-term course, but that, perhaps, is another conversation.

        In any case, by denying the fundamental system you are based in, and demanding that survival not take any energy, you undercut your own foundation, and that causes problems for you.

        Human rights are a social contract. They are nice, and we should keep them. However, they don’t eradicate the animal and natural foundation upon which we stand, and they absolutely must bend to necessity.

        You have an animal right to exist until you die by natural processes, like disease, old age, predation, etc. You have a human right not to be tortured, enslaved, etc, because that is a goal we all agree on. But you don’t have a right to have other animals take care of all of your needs when they don’t want to. That would be slavery.