lysdexic@programming.devM to C++@programming.devEnglish · 7 months agoC++ creator rebuts White House warningwww.infoworld.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up131arrow-down11cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up130arrow-down1external-linkC++ creator rebuts White House warningwww.infoworld.comlysdexic@programming.devM to C++@programming.devEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareTechNom (nobody)@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoThat works only if memory safety is optional. Additions of the language features needed for mandatory memory safety are backwards incompatible.
minus-squareBaardFigur@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agostd::string broke ABI in 2011iirc. Some breakage once in a while should be ok imo
That works only if memory safety is optional. Additions of the language features needed for mandatory memory safety are backwards incompatible.
std::string broke ABI in 2011iirc. Some breakage once in a while should be ok imo