Me personally, I find the EZLN fascinating. (if there is anything bad about them, let me know because I do not know much bad things about them)

They are one of the few movements that anarchists praise that I actually think are based, although the Zapatistas have told westerners to stop calling them anarchists, communists, or anything else.

They also fight against drug cartels and seem to have created one of the most stable territories in the Chiapas region.

However, they are too small to do anything big like overthrowing the Mexican government. They would be crushed quickly.

Give me your thoughts on the EZLN and/or, as the title suggests, any non-ML movements that you support.

    • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Did someone legitimately downvote the abolishment movement??? lenin facepalm deng stare

      Dang didn’t know Lemmygrad was pro-slavery /s

      • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Probably one of those wandering libs.

        Or mistook it for the anti-alcohol one. I know I did, until I read your comment

        • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          If I remember right prohibition was actually pretty based. Alcohol was a tool of oppression whether in sedating factory proletarians or getting indigenous people drunk to make it easier to steal their land. Manhattan for example means “the place where we all became intoxicated.” Source I vaguely remember:

          • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Yeah, but prohibition was absolute garbage since everyone was STILL drunk, just now the alcohol supply was owned by the Mob.

            Per one journalist’s study, it took a maximum of 10 minutes for a “tourist” “out of towner” in any city in the US to find alcohol. The record was a 30 seconds when the cab driver of one city immediately pulled out beer from a compartment in the cab when asked where to get alcohol.

            • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Sure, alcohol wasn’t eliminated, but it was progress. Back before prohibition people drank alcohol like water, and the fact that most don’t anymore is good (not that there aren’t widespread substance abuse problems of other types). I suggest you listen to the Gastropod episode.

              • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                I have before, but the reduction in alcohol drinking primarily came from the restriction, rationing, and lack of ingredients during WW1 and WW2 as opposed to Prohibition. It had a worse inverse effect, all it did was force drinking underground and made it a taboo topic to discuss.

                Prohibition increased alcohol stockpiling which allowed most people to “ride out” the initial wave, and by the time many stockpiles ran dry, the mob and local moonshiners has established a strong enough network to maintain supply.

                Funnily enough, one bar stockpiled so much alcohol prior to prohibition, that they were able to legally sell and advertise their alcohol for the entire prohibition since it was legal to sell Pre-Prohibiton alcohol.

  • DankZedong @lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Just came back from a holiday there: Basque independence movement. The Basque have their own language, culture, socio-economic vision so I see no reason why I shouldn’t support them wanting to become independent from Spain and France.

      • Valbrandur@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m not who you are replying to, but here’s a fun fact: years ago I did some research on the International Brigades that required pulling out documents from the SOVDOC.

        One of these was the record of a political discussion in 1936-37 between members of a communist unit that included Catalonian independentists, about the question of self-determination for Spain’s various nationalities. The meeting ended with a recommendation of Stalin’s Marxism and the National Question as a read for the unit’s members and the decision that the text’s conclusions was the way of thought to follow.

        To this day, I still recommend that one text to anyone who wishes to know how to proceed ideologically in regards to any movement for national independence, including Catalonia’s.

  • Nimux@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Lukashenko’s administration is pretty good imo, even though it’s not a party or organization.

    • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      From a Belarussian person, Lukashenko’s administration has been a disaster for the people of Belarus.

      His only saving grace is preventing Belarus from becoming a US vassal state like Ukraine or Poland. Other then that I’m very certain that a chimpanzee could run Belarus better then Lukashenko.

      He’s basically a if you tried to copy Kim Ill Sung and horrifically failed and copied the inverse of all of Kim’s traits. Lukashenko is extremely reactionary, capitalist, and just a terrible leader.

  • ☭CommieWolf☆@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Lula’s worker’s party in Brazil, they’ve done incredible work helping the most impoverished people of the country, and are the most progressive in South America in my book.

  • Valbrandur@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    However, they are too small to do anything big like overthrowing the Mexican government. They would be crushed quickly.

    I do not think the EZLN has the wish to do so anyway. Staying relatively under the radar is the main reason why they have survived until now like they have.