plspls_pls_ stop calling each other fascists or astroturfers unless you have a thorough understanding of the uncommitted movement and what u.s. primaries are. there is so much blatant misunderstanding and misinfo going on it’s bad.

edit: if any loser dares call for an uncommitted vote in the general election? i will kick them in the balls (gender neutral) (in minecraft)

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 years ago

    “An uncommitted movement will not be called for the general”

    Okay, but what if I direct you to people calling for exactly that.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 years ago

      please do so and i’ll tell them to kick rocks.

      (you can’t even vote uncommitted in the general afaik it’s not even an option)

      one should direct criticism to those doing the bad thing, not the ones with vague aesthetics of the bad thing when viewed through a bad-faith lens.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        please do so and i’ll tell them to kick rocks.

        Unironically I’m happy to hear this.

        (you can’t even vote uncommitted in the general afaik it’s not even an option)

        Some states allow write-ins for the General.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 years ago

          yay!

          and yeah, but write-ins are quite distinct from an uncommitted vote.

          in an earlier thread someone compared the general to the trolley problem, with a vote for Biden being the lesser of two evils. at the same time, i view the uncommitted movement as a way of trying to get as many people untied from the Biden track as possible.

  • glizzyguzzler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 years ago

    It is clear within the US that the uncommitted movement is grossly misunderstood outside of the people who care to engage with anti-genocide protest efforts. Because the main stream media did not cover it effectively up to the primary election and barely covered it after.

    It is also clear that people from other countries do not understand the US primary system at all.

    For Democrats, voter turn out is what matters. And that the “uncommitted” vote does not beat Biden. The uncommitted vote will not beat Biden since no news orgs covered it well so few know about it unless previously involved in anti-genocide efforts. Only Democrats can vote in the US Democrat primary, so high primary turnout shows how many democrats are willing to vote for Biden come election AND the uncommitted vote shows an easy tally of how many people were moved enough to discover the uncommitted vote movement and take part to support ending the genocide of the Palestinians.

    If you see actual astroturfing, fascists-in-leftist-clothing calling for an uncommitted vote in the general, tell them to “fuck off tankie”.

    In the US general election there will be no “uncommitted” option, showing that they are out-of-state fascists. Tell them to eat shit loudly and do not engage further with the fascies.

    The US general election is serious as the republican challenger is the fascist bitch who tried to overthrow the government. But the genocide of the Palestinians is also serious, they’re actually dying by the thousands and after you die you’re dead it’s donezo, and anyone should be able to realize that that’s horrendous

      • glizzyguzzler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you don’t vote, I don’t care, I say donezo on the reg and will say it again. Doesn’t change that Palestinians are dying by the thousands

        Giving up is worthless, especially when one evil will ensure everyone in the LGBTQ+ sphere will die at some point in the near future and one won’t. Look inside yourself from an ethical perspective - if you can make some positive change, do it. Especially if it costs you nothing but gets trans people everything

          • glizzyguzzler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 years ago

            Trans people are at risk right now, states that ban transitioning will kill them. Gay people were at risk years ago but decades of voting for politicians that support peoples’ rights have allowed you to live and be out now. I am glad you have the rights you deserve and will not lose them in a year, but trans people are losing rights they deserve now. Not to mention abortion rights have been lost that are deserved well.

            But voting got justices in place to enact rulings that decriminalized sodomy in 2003. Literally it was illegal to be gay in a bunch of states prior to 2003. Just as not voting let Trump install justices that removed abortion access.

            Your right to a same-sex marriage (2015 ruling, very recent, only 36/50 states allowed same-sex marriage prior to that ruling and of course after 2003) and even being with someone of the same-sex (2003 ruling) are both Supreme Court rulings that can easily be repealed just as Roe v Wade was. I want everyone’s right to love who they want to be enshrined in the constitution, but until it is same-sex relationships are somewhat vulnerable. Voting and political action are the only way to enable your rights to remain forever. And voting is ez pz you just tick a few boxes for the person that doesn’t want to kill trans people.

            You are correct; your life will continue whether or not you vote. But the quality of life is greatly impacted by the will of the people, which is gauged through voting. And the quality of life of other groups (people transitioning) are in danger right now

      • zaph@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you don’t think your voice matters in the ballot box, why do you assume it matters anywhere?

        • spacedout@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Aka, if the electoral system is rigged, just give up. There is no alternative. Unless of course you find yourself within a nation with a somewhat browner skin color. Then expect liberation and democratization by way of the bomb.

      • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Uncritical identitarian ideologues are the bane of all movements. You’re committed to the identity of being a leftist/socialist/communist rather than the ideology, just like the Christian fascists that explicitly ignore every good idea in the Bible in favor of the worst ideas.

        Over time, many supposed Marxists have decided to ignore the best principles and goals outlined by the man himself. You instead favor what “works” to build a “committed” movement. Unfortunately, “committed” means committed to the identity, while things only “work” if they ensure the group’s existence.

        Accomplishing the stated goals of the group doesn’t matter so long as it has a stable niche. It basically works by evolutionary logic, with accuracy and ethics only mattering if it helps the group survive. It becomes cultish, often explicitly so if there is centralized power.

        The parallels between Christianity and Marxism become more clear with how they reference the texts written by their great leaders selectively, highlighting whatever fits their current agenda. The most counterintuitive part is that we don’t think about ideas in the way that they actually behave, instead assuming they serve us.

        People usually believe their own shit, but produce outcomes that look like sociopathic calculus. Liberals genuinely believe what they say about liberalism. Capitalists genuinely believe most of their nonsense arguments. It doesn’t matter that social programs create stability, or that regulations often benefit the unwilling companies in the long run. The saying “we often attribute stupidity to malice” is inaccurate. We really attribute evolution to intelligence.

        People with nonsense ideologies almost never disbelieve everything they say. Fascist leaders buy most of their own bullshit. You believe in your own flawed logic. I probably believe bullshit about something, so I keep an open mind.

    • tabularasa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Only Democrats can vote in the US Democrat primary,

      This is not true. There are multiple states that allow voting in the primary of a party to which you are not registered. You just can’t vote in both primaries.

      • glizzyguzzler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        🤓🤓🤓 But in more seriousness, it is true for the majority - ok some states let independents vote in one party’s primary but they have to request it and it’s harder and I’m not gonna add that addendum to a long ass diatribe

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      i still don’t quite get how tankie ideology plays into this but past that, yes, i agree with everything you have said. :)

      • glizzyguzzler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Ah I meant that a “fascist-in-leftist-clothing” is a tankie! (Edit: v big generalization of course)

        Thanks for making the me-me!

        • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          no prob :) i still don’t quite think that’s what the definition of tankie is but imma let it slide since that is not the topic of this post.

  • jackalope@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fine for people to voted uncommitted but jot sure why we don’t see more people voting in the republican primary to throw trump off balance.

    • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Assuming I’m understanding correctly, only a few states allow people to vote in a primary for a party that they’re not registered as. Honestly, I’m not sure why any states still allow that, because I wouldn’t want any registered Republicans voting in the Democratic primary any more than the other way around.

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        its not exactly as easy as it sounds, as if youre in a different party (e.g no party preference) you have to make a follow up request for another ballot of another party. the ballot doesnt get mailed in with the initial ballot. its effectively block anyone wanting the easy way to do it, over the mail at the least.

    • Rascabin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      His mind is capable of speaking up to a third grade level. The people in favor of Trump understand him clearly.

    • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      You see that on occasion. My dad was registered Republican for many years in Florida just to vote in the primary for the less batshit option, and you have to be registered for a party to vote in their primary in Florida. In Minnesota, where I currently live, it’s an open-ish primary where I could have theoretically chosen to vote in the Republican primary but you have to sign something saying you generally agree with that party’s platform - and I can’t honestly say I agree at all with the Republicans, so it wouldn’t have been legal for me to vote in the Republican primary.

    • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The democratic party in my state puts money and campaign assistance behind smaller local races (congressional, state legislature, and small local races) based on primary numbers. My county has about 0.7x dem primary voters vs. our rep primary voters. As we’re finally turning blue enough that we might win a race here and there, we’re getting a lot more assistance from the larger dem strongholds in the state. My congressional rep is doing more events in my county instead of focusing on the bigger cities in their district. It’s all a snowball effect. More engagement by dems in the primaries means more focus on campaigns in my area means bigger dem voter turnout in my area, and the cycle builds upon itself. If I vote republican in the primaries to be a spoiler, the dem party just sees my county shifting further right. Plus, my primary vote actually helps decide on my dem candidates in my region. It’s a whole lot more than just one office.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    The uncommitted movement will, in fact, be called for the general election - by assholes who just want Biden to lose.

    You can ignore them. But they will be there. And the mouth noises they make will be based on sincere and reasonable criticism.

    The thing about objecting ‘we can’t do [blank] because conservatives will abuse it in bad faith’ is, conservatives will absofuckinglutely abuse [blank] in bad faith. Probably whether or not we do it. That part of the objection is real - even if we should still do [blank]. We can only do [blank] in spite of them.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      probably true, sadly. but it won’t be the same people group who is calling for it now.

      that’s literally all i care about now with this post is we need to stop calling people who are using their civic rights to speak against genocide fascist.

      tell them their strategy will backfire, fine, tell them it’s a miscalculation, fine. but don’t just plaster them with the fascism tag. it makes me sick how people trying to do the right thing are getting harrassed.

  • lorty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    And here I was thinking the uncommited movement meant something might be done. If you are still calling for Biden, then why even bother voting uncommitted? Why pretend to dissent if you’ll fall in line when it matters?

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 years ago

      To send a message in the primary, and avoid a Trump win in the general.

      Is that not obvious?

      • Spaceballstheusername@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        There’s no message being sent if there’s no real threat behind the message or else the message isn’t being received if the Biden administration doesn’t change their stance.

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Seems like the message has made its way through the news and social media. Just because Biden hasn’t changed his stance completely doesn’t mean the message isn’t being received.

          • Spaceballstheusername@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            The message is he’ll lose the election if he doesn’t change his stance. So if he has received it and chose to ignore it then why is he running. Either he doesn’t believe the threat or he doesn’t want to win.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              The message is that he’s pissed off a huge portion of his base, and they don’t approve of what he’s doing.

              There’s obviously more work to be done advocating for change. And it can be done under Biden, or under Trump. Which would you prefer?

    • eveninghere@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Agreed. If you vote for Biden anyway, he doesn’t have the incentive to care.

      Do they wait for the next 4 years to do this again? I like the intention but honestly don’t understand the point.

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        Agreed. If you vote for Biden anyway, he doesn’t have the incentive to care.

        And if you don’t, you risk something so much worse.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    If people commit to it in the primaries then the demonization will carry to the general. But I suppose people aren’t familiar with voter apathy

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      If somebody commits to it in the primary, then their mind is already made up. It sounds like you’re putting the cart before the horse here. People are voting uncommitted because of how they feel about Biden; their feelings about Biden aren’t changing because they vote uncommitted.

      This is actually good for Biden, because he can check the pulse of the electorate going into the general election. Polling data, as we know by now, is notoriously unreliable. This is a way to get a message to Biden about what’s important to his voter base. Without this information, people might not show up to vote, and he might have no idea why.

  • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    The problem is that Biden knows that all of these people will vote for him anyways in the general election, so he doesn’t care.

  • spacedout@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fuck bottoming for Biden and Trump. If you vote Biden, you’re enabling genocide. Kind regards, rest of the world.

    • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      Forgive me if, when presented with the trolley problem and the person on track b would die anyways if I did not pull the lever, if I pulled that lever instead of ignoring everything and/or jumping off a cliff. The political situation is bleak here, and the machine is designed to keep Americans placated, disenfranchised, and generally apathetic. We don’t have coalition voting. We don’t have ranked choice, and it’s even banned in certain states! If there’s a proper alternative to Biden in this country, that information has to be disseminated to hundreds of millions and convince them to change their vote. It’s possible that someone could come along but they’d have to work fast I sure as hell don’t see anyone with that kind of rallying power. Do you have any suggestions on who I should vote for?.. Because my choice is first and foremost in the interest of overall harm reduction in whatever practical terms that can actually be accomplished in this country.

      Declining to vote in this system is, effectively, silently endorsing whoever gets in; it signals that you’re ok with everything, or at least it gets interpreted that way by politicians 100x more than any sort of “protest” effect you think not voting will achieve. Literally if you don’t vote for a politician why should they care what the fuck you think? One party doesn’t even want us voting at all because it means they can give less of a fuck about us! Frankly, I don’t want to see the orange man in office again, and he will be worse than even self-professed Zionist Joe on matters pertaining to the rest of the world. Again, I’m open to an alternative if you can give me one that’s not sticking my head in the sand or some fetishistic “revolution” way too many people pine for without having a single ounce of solidarity in their real lives.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If you don’t vote for Biden, you’re okay with a Trump victory.

      Kind regards, sane people.

    • Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Dear rest of the world, why haven’t you stopped it? And don’t say anything about a nonbinding UN resolution.

      • spacedout@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        If it wasn’t for the overpowered military industrial complex and veto in the security council, I’m pretty sure we’d have a no fly zone and democratic transition in the US by now.

    • spacedout@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      So many years I’ve heard Americans complain, rightly so, about the duopoly farming your insecurities for profits. Each cycle the duopoly gets worse and worse. Again we’re at a point where it seems they can’t stoop any lower, and again most seemingly progressive Americans suddenly become incredibly pragmatist, excusing genocide, destruction of the environment, war in Europe, cold war 2.0, because “the alternative is worse”. Fuck that from the rest of the world that has to live under your megalomanic geriatric child killing leaders. You need to find a solution, and voting for the lesser evil just ain’t it, because it is already so incredible destructive and outright barbarian. Make a third way, engage Trump voters on their home turf, make a revolution, I don’t care, just leave us the fuck alone. Thank you.

  • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    This kind of post is exactly how Trump is going to be elected to the Supreme Court, so he can grant himself immunity. You should be ashamed of yourself.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      i know you probably hear this a lot, but i encourage you not to do so. until we have ranked choice voting, voting for the democrat candidate in the general will always be a needed form of harm reduction, especially if you live in a swing state.

      others are probably better at expressing this than i, so i’ll leave it at that. :)

  • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s so unfathomable to me to think you cannot send a message by having an opinion, only by using an indirect possible half message via an entirely different channel used for other things? It’s crazy talking to think political officers don’t understand or know what people ask for, but they will understand this? It’s coming from ignorance or do people actually not understand?