• mrginger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    But you’re supposed to pick a side and be willing to literally lay down your life for them and their cause! Ra ra, go team go. Otherwise you’re just part of the problem according to either side.

    I agree with you and I’ll go a step further and say fuck all politicians in general. Today, they’re all owned in some way by the money that puts them in power. They’ll all tell you what you want to hear. They’re all experts in half truths. Never trust a politician.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Politicians are owned by their constituents, who they overwhelmingly vote in alignment with.

      The whole “politicians are owned” thing just doesn’t show up in any data whatsoever.

      • mrginger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Take one look at who the biggest lobbyists in the US are. Then compare that to the most glaring issues we have in the US. I’ll wait.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Here’s a link of the top US lobbies, and I’ll go ahead and spoil that it isn’t what you’d think - for instance, no energy lobby makes the list.

          Also, you’d think actual votes would be more along lobbyist lines than constituent lines but they are not.

          https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/top-spenders

          NAR for instance would absolutely love zoning changes that create more homes to sell. That’s a lobby we should listen to.

          But again, we don’t, because getting re-elected is always of paramount importance.

          • mrginger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re joking right? https://www.statista.com/statistics/257364/top-lobbying-industries-in-the-us/

            From your own source. https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2023/02/oil-and-gas-industry-spent-124-4-million-on-federal-lobbying-amid-record-profits-in-2022/#:~:text=The oil and gas industry,slightly when adjusted for inflation.

            And for you last point about NAR, I have doubts. I could see home builders and home buyers benefitting from zoning changes. It would drive down costs of a new home, open up more choices for home buyers, and put construction companies to work. Realtors are middle men who work off commissions. The more they can sell a house for the more commission they make. Realtors have a vested interest keeping the market balanced in their favor.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Realtors with more property to sell make more than realtors with less property to sell. Do you know actual realtors? The vast majority are not selling a few multi-million houses and calling it a year.

              Look at what they lobby for: https://www.nar.realtor/advocacy/federal-advocacy/all-federal-issues

              A recent NAR study estimates that the U.S. has developed an “underbuilding gap” of at least 5.5 million housing units over the last 20 years. This translates into more than $4 trillion in underinvestment in housing. Even relatively modest steps taken now to reduce this gap will unleash tremendous economic activity and create millions of new jobs.

              Multi-family housing proposals are a core plank of their program, for instance - and yet politicians don’t listen to them because their constituents don’t want them to

              I’m not sure what you think you’re arguing when you call me out my link then share data that agrees with my link.

              Your preconceived notions are incorrect, and lying about data doesn’t make it correct

              • mrginger@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes I do. None of them are selling affordable single family homes.

                As a matter of fact multi-family housing is leading a housing construction “boom” as of articles published 6 days ago.

                Here’s a quote from MReport:

                Further, almost two-thirds of the apartments build during the pandemic are clustered in just 20 high-growth metropolitan areas, which make up about 41% of the total renter population in the U.S. Therefore, for many other places, the new supply barely made a dent in the existing supply. What’s more, around 89% of the apartments completed in the last three years are high-end and, thus, target upper-middle- and high-income buyers and renters.

                So they are building “multi-family homes”, but targeting, wait for it, people with lot’s of money.

                So you quit lying.

                Come to think of it, you’re singling out the and focusing on the real estate angle pretty hard. Why is that?

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  It doesn’t matter who they’re targeting, because they’re increasing supply

                  You’re so desperate to have all lobbyists be inherently bad that you’re not thinking things through.

                  Real estate is easy because local ordinances prevent building, and congresspeople are held accountable locally. We can discuss any lobbying if you’d like and are willing to learn.

                  I’m a climate lobbyist, for example.

                  • mrginger@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Continuing with the real-estate discussion (I know, now I’m focusing on it ;-) ), I whole heartedly disagree. When ignoring the needs of the lower 75% of the country’s wage earners, and focusing your efforts on the upper 25%, something is glaringly, obviously wrong, and saying things like,

                    It doesn’t matter who they’re targeting, because they’re increasing supply.

                    shows a level of privilege that most people in the US cannot fathom or afford, myself included. That statement says…a lot, but I don’t want to devolve into ad hominin bs because now you’ve piqued my interest.

                    Honestly, and I genuinely mean this, yes, I would love to know what a climate lobbyist does.

                    I know tone doesn’t translate via text very well, but I can assure you I’m not desperate to have all lobbyists be inherently bad. Am I angry? Yes, but never desperate, and I’m not angry without reason. I’ve seen it directly, more than once in my lifetime, politicians and policy be influenced by the efforts of lobbyists and their money. Not just something I read in the news, heard on the radio, or saw on a website. I’ve seen funding pulled from one project to another because of lobbyists. Not because the project the funding was being pulled from wasn’t worthy, but our lobbyists weren’t as good (or willing to donate as much) as their lobbyists.

                    It’s a system that allows to much room for abuse, is abused every single day. Even if for something as noble as a climate lobbyist, the quote “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.” I would think still rings true (religious connotations notwithstanding).

                    Now don’t ask me how to fix it all because I have no clue. Maybe it’s the best we have. I dunno. 😂 I just choose, like I said earlier never to trust a politician. They’re all owned in some way by the money that puts them in power.

                    Edit: I do want to say, I am enjoying this discussion. Thank you for making a long day at the office a little bit more interesting.

      • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m curious as to how being a politician is even a job? Do they get salary? If so, from what? How do they pay their mortgages?

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Politicians are almost all paid (some things like city council aren’t necessarily paid). Many politicians have “day jobs” they only leave once they reach a level of office where they can live off the pay.

          Speaking very broadly, the cutoff is generally “state rep or higher” or “in a big city” where you can lean on politician as your main source of income.

          • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I like how “day job” is in quotes. That makes it seem even sketchier than I originally thought lol

            what kind of “day jobs” are we talking about here? Are they in an office?

            And yeah, how do they have time to be a politician if they have that day job going?

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve worked with local politicians in office settings, as salespeople (trained a city councilwoman as a saleswoman once), etc. They also sometimes own businesses (a bit of selection bias there because that “plays” really well to the electorate).

              Most political jobs that aren’t state/federal arent very demanding of time. School board, local government, etc, is generally unpaid/low pay and very much part time. If you can carve a couple nights a week, you can work in local gov.

              • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They also sometimes own businesses

                Ah yeah. The kind of people who already had money to start a business in the first place.

                If you can carve a couple nights a week, you can work in local gov.

                That seems like not nearly enough time to be putting into something that is meant to change how things work. Government is incredibly slow though, I’m aware…

                None of this is making them sound… well better.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Most people start a business via a small business loan, which is surprisingly easy (in my view) to qualify for. You also only need like $50 in my state to register as a business owner.

                  Lots of relatively poor people own their own business. I ran my own consultancy for a while and I was definitely not rich.

                  Couple nights a week is plenty when you’re on city council for a town of 10,000 people. There aren’t that many hearings

                  • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Most people start a business via a small business loan, which is surprisingly easy (in my view) to qualify for. You also only need like $50 in my state to register as a business owner.

                    Now this is really wild to me. If I walked into a place and tried to get a business loan, I guarantee they’d say no to me REAL quick.

                    I don’t think only rich people own businesses but I think people who are able to be in a place financially where they can get a loan to start a business, are probably better off financially than say, some no body like myself.

                    There aren’t that many hearings

                    Jesus… is that based on locality or? That almost sounds like no one is really doing anything. What do they actually do?

                    Also I want to add, I have thought about getting into politics and the reason I don’t is the reasoning behind these questions. I can’t imagine having a job and doing this but really only doing it like politics are my hobby and hearings are my little meet ups.