• ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I was more saying we seem to have different definitions of “real power”. You’re not wrong that they have influence, but the influence they have doesn’t seem like “dictator level” power. Simple disagreement of terms.

    Given the context of someone asking “is it good the man has cancer”, people disagreeing with “there’s no real reason to want him to have cancer, so no” are easily mistaken as suggesting that maybe it is good he has cancer.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      “real power” to me, is being able to make the government craft legislation that suits you. I can’t do that, can you?

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, we’ve already determined that we have different definitions.

        To me, real power would be if they could just choose not to disclose the information.

      • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeh, I can actually - I can write to my MP, go and see them in the local surgery and persuade them to table questions and even draft legislation It’s quite cool.