• fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s like gas prices early in the pandemic, but not quite as bad.

        They grossly overproduced, sat on a stockpile that couldn’t sell which costs them a ton and had to sell them for nothing. There’s nowhere for the price to go but up.

        • 𝕽𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖎𝖊𝖘𝖙@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          I bought a WD Black 4TB gen4 nvme for just under $200 over the holidays.

          The listing says up to 7,300MB/s. I only have a gen3 SSD slot so I can’t verify that but it saturates the gen3 capabilities.

        • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          It is so frustrating trying to buy a nvme ssd because they make it so unclear which models have DDR and which don’t. I tried to buy one recently to upgrade a family member’s computer and was wondering how a non technical person has any chance of finding something decent.

        • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          MB/s

          Seq 1M Q8T1
          1Gb
          2838 Read 2255 Write
          4Gb
          1419 Read 2239 Write

          Random 4k
          44.89 Read 108.33 Write

      • Turun@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Seriously, a lot of weirdly negative comments here.

        Yeah, it’s not great that prices go up, but a few months ago was the lowest price for memory and storage we have ever seen in all of history. 40€/TB at the low end for SSDs. That’s absolutely insane. It was entirely expected for prices to rise a bit again.

  • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    10 months ago

    And then in 5 years they’ll all settle for a few million dollars in a class action for price fixing. Rinse, repeat.

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      10 months ago

      Of course, the customer payout will eventually amount to $5/affected customer, but only those who replied to their rather invasive survey, paid out over 3 payments over the coming year.

      • NaiveBayesian@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Don’t forget it’s usually just US citizens who even get the chance to jump onto such class action suits. The rest of the world don’t even get their $5.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Just the cost of doing business. Just ask all the hedgefunds that break the rules time and time again and simply pay a small fee to FINRA (if at all)

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    What a surprise, capitalists can’t keep making more money quarter after quarter so instead they just rack up the prices for no reason other than the c-suite wants more bonus money.

    Fucking PATHETIC and reprehensible

      • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        10 months ago

        Love how everyone’s argument for capitalism is just ‘well communism sucks too’.

        Good job regurgitating half a century’s worth of propaganda, no one mentioned communism and there’s more than just 2 ways to run q society

        • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          10 months ago

          How about making fair regulations to stop corporations from abusing capitalism instead of forcing communism on everyone?

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          31
          ·
          10 months ago

          I was born and have lived in a communist country. Good job regurgitating garbage tired internet arguments.

            • Tja@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              10 months ago

              Except there are democratic capitalist countries, all communist countries are dictatorships.

                • Tja@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  The classic: I’m not going to disprove you because I cannot name one communist country that isn’t a dictatorship, but I want to sound cool nonetheless. Well done.

                  How’s the Che Guevara t-shirt made in a sweatshop doing?

          • PorkSoda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Umm, you’re the only one here talking about communism.

            The other guy just said capitalism, in its current late stage, sucks and is unsustainable.

            • Tja@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yes, I’m the only one talking about communism in lemmy, you got me there…

              • Aceticon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                You might want to go check about Social Democracy.

                You know, like in several Scandinavian countries, the very same that keep scoring high in happinness indices and have the highest per-capita wealth in the World (most easilly beating the US).

                Just because you (understandably, if you indeed were born in an ex-Communist country) have a trauma with “Communism” that doesn’t mean that “there are only two options Capitalism or Communism” isn’t a massive falacy or that Capitalism is a great way to manage a country.

                That you keep doubling down just makes it seem you’re a mindless fan of Capitalism rather than an oppositor of Communism, and that kind of tribalist take is quite the simpleton approach to evaluation options for the managing of actual countries.

                It really makes no logical sense to respond to criticism of Capitalism with “whatabout Communism”.

                • Tja@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Social democracy is a flavor of capitalism. See Norways sovereign fund. Every country in Europe is a capitalist country, the happy ones (Scandinavia, Austria, Switzerland) and the less happy ones.

            • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              It doesn’t matter, even a fully actualized public owned economy still requires that it estimate and compare production and capital increase so it knows 1. How much to alot for each citizen in the daily/weekly/monthly UBI, and 2. How to compare its production capacity and volume of capital to other countries who may or may not also be collectivist.

              Both of these needs require the exact understanding of production increase so that it can accurately estimate the capital (capital in this sense being the amount of wealth set aside specifically for the increase in production capacity/efficiency) that allows the economy to grow. Thus they can take that information and increase the amount of dollars available to the country or it’s citizens for use or trade with other nations.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Of course. I don’t like you, you don’t get sugar/meat/butter/gasoline/freedom. Price: infinite.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            The problem is systemic and you’re just looking at the symptoms not the disease.

            Lawmakers (politcians in power) and lawenforcers (judges, regulators, police) become corrupt in a Capitalism system for a simple reason: when the top social message is “Greed is good”, lawmaker and lawenforcers too - just like everybody else - will have as top priority the maximizing of personal upsides, even if only because they too want to “live the good life” that the Media in Capitalist countries is always showing as being lived by others.

            So laws are made to benefit those who can make the lawmakers rich and to make it legal for them to get paid in that way, so over time laws and the structures are changed to make corruption de facto be legal (even if only by not being prosecuted).

            Similarly in the Justice System you have de facto different criteria depending on the wealth of each side, Justice which is unaffordable for anybody but the rich, arbitrary or non-enforcement of laws and regulations and so on.

            It’s ridiculous to expect that in a Society were Greed Is Good, people with lots of power (politicians, members of the Judiciary) will somehow put “service to others” ahead of “personal upside maximization”.

            Capitalism naturally tends to become Crony Capitalism over time and only very strong and genuine Democractic structures (with politics, the judiciary and the press being strong and independent pillars of Democracy, and no mathematical rigging of voting systems to put always people from the same 2 groups in power) can delay that tendency, and if you look around to places like the US with its power duopoly, “vote me ´cause I’m not as bad as the other guy” voting theatre and politically nominated top judges, aren’t strong and genuine Democracies.

            You shout about “don’t legalize bribery” and yet the systems in place in most Capitalist so-called Democracies make sure the kind of politicians who get power are the ones who make bribery legal and even normal, and that the Judicial System is thoroughly subverted to close its eyes to things any normal person would consider Bribery and Corruption - you will never get your wish because the very system is designed for that never to happen and even if by magic tomorrow every politician and member of the Judicial System were impeccably honest and put “public service” above “personal upside maximization”, Capitalism would over time subvert it, be it because many of those would look around and see others getting benefits from “personal upside maximization” and think “why not me?” whilst lots of dishonest people are attracted to positions of power were they can more easilly increase personal wealth, such as politics or the Judiciary so over time those areas would be wholly riddled with rot, just as they are now.

            It’s funny because the whole utopian Communism (a World were everybody is equal) is impossible and always end up in a Dictatorship were some are elite and the rest as plebs, is due to the same human characteristics why “Pure” Capitalism is impossible and will always end up as Crony Capitalism.

            • Tja@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              So if both capitalism and communism are not possible due to greed, what do you suggest? Feudalism? Anarchism?

              Capitalism sucks, but everything else sucks even more.

            • Tja@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              It doesn’t have anything to do with capitalism, tho. Plenty of countries where lobbying is regulated/forbidden.

  • JCreazy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nobody is buying so let’s increase the price. Makes a lot of sense. Good job guys.

    • RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      If people generally atent buying, there’s still People that need to buy (businesses, oems, etc)

      They’re just doing the ol covid ratchet. Tightening the thumbscrews on the people who can’t opt out.

      Doesn’t affect their bottom line much if nobody’s choosing to buy.

    • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      They drastically increased production after covid, and then with inflation and the economy slowing down, demand crashed, meaning they had a fuckton of NAND and nobody to sell it to. They needed to get rid of it so they sold it all at a steep discount below the break even mark, losing billions of dollars in the process (I don’t think any NAND manufacturer had a profitable 2023?). Now, they’re cutting back production to profitable levels that actually meet demand, so prices will increase and return to normal.

    • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They lost billions of dollars due to production being way higher than demand during 2023, it’s only collusion in the sense that they all want to actually make some money on the NAND they manufacture.

  • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Demand is way down, so they raise prices. This is the cycle that keeps repeating, and nobody should be surprised.

      • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s exactly how this works, and during a quarterly review with Samsung, they literally told me they were doing this. Nobody in the industry is surprised by this.

        Not sure why you’d deny what you literally see happening.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It shouldn’t (edited) matter if the rise the prices. Nobody’s buying, right?

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The only claim in this thread that demand is down is from you. When demand is already low, prices going up makes no sense.

          This is not to say that someone wouldn’t do it anyways, but then there’s also Erdoğan who lowered interests to “combat inflation” against advice of his central bankers, whom he fired. Then inflation becomes worse and surprised Pikachu face ensues

          • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I have information directly from the three main manufacturers. Demand is down, production is down, so in order to not show losses on the balance sheet prices went up.

            TSMC did the same thing last year- raised prices by around 27% for all customers. Because demand is way, WAY down. Sadly their increase wasn’t enough to stave off a drop in revenue.

            When you have the whole market cornered, normal supply and demand economics don’t apply.

            • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Do they have a captive audience for those who still have a demand? I can understand “look, if we have to keep the production lines going to provide you with required hardware, of which we are not selling as much as we used to, we have to raise prices” - but if the customers who still buy are flexible, this would only mean even less people buy.

              • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Customers are fairly inflexible. If you need storage or ram for 10k new servers, that’s it. You have to have it. And since all manufacturers raised prices, you’re going to spend more. Making matters worse, if you have to onboard another vendor to safe a few tens of thousands of dollars, you can easily spend hundreds of thousands on time and resources to go through a qualification cycle alone.

                Home computers make up a significantly smaller portion of the computer component space. So while this might prevent a person from upgrading their SSD or building a DDR 5 equipped gaming computer, that’s small percentages of sales. A single corporate relationship account will buy thousands of devices at a time, larger accounts will buy tens of hundreds of thousands. A cloud operator building 10k servers with 12 channels of RAM will buy 24 dimms per server. It’s a totally different game.

                • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  In principal I would say “fair enough”, except that for cloud operators, the service prices would also probably increase, possibly leading to less end user demand for cloud space. Anyways, your point is well constructed, I concede ;) Although the logic “less customers, therefore let’s raise prices” would drive a lot of vendors into bankrupcy.

      • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        By cut supply, you mean several fabs have suffered catastrophic losses and turned down production for nearly a year? Because that’s what happened.

        And yes, nobody makes products when there’s no demand for them. It’s the basics of how they turn the screws to buyers at all times.

        • stevehobbes@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          They cut supply in like September. They were all fighting for market share still, largely driven by Samsung, hence the low prices.

          Server shipments were way down because everyone overbought in 2021/2022.

          The NAND market has always been an antitrust shit show.

          • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yup. They control the entire market and there’s a decreasing number of fabs. They raise prices to ensure revenue doesn’t drop and they can keep showing investors lines going up.

            It’s idiotic, and it’s how the industry has worked for decades at this point. Just wait till people figure out the games played by fabs, substrate manufacturers, and component suppliers…

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 months ago

    The main factor is normally panic article like this.

    “Hey, the price is going to go up later this year!”

    *people buy now*

    *demand goes up*

    *price goes up*

  • HidingCat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    Well, I saw this coming and got a new 2TB SSD before 11.11 even. Though now thinking if I should have gotten 4TB instead. xD

    Also, this kinda is like collusion, no?

    • Longpork2@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe that’s their real play here? Put out a bunch of news about upcoming price hikes, and watch everyone scramble to buy up their current stock.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    They’re not even going to make an excuse for it like “the power went off for a split second in one room at one factory because we flicked a switch”? Regardless, I’m fine with waiting years for them to tire themselves out with all the screaming about how prices must rise. It gives me great pleasure to not reward this behavior while they’re pulling this shit. Raise the prices all you want, I’m not buying.

  • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    In the US there is enormous investment in new NAND and other chips manufacturing. The government does not want these products and materials to be expensive or scarce. So the good news is the US gov will likely jump on this immediately.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    I feel like China enacting protectionist policies on lithium will do more to drive up chip prices. People are broke right now, so choking out the retail supply of chips to artificially raise prices will just result in miserable quarters for Micron, Hynix, and Samsung.

  • Xavier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Too late, I was buying up a bunch of high TBW solid state drives the last ~2 years, even this Black Friday/Boxing Day there were a few last deals.

    My focus was mostly on Intel Optane leftovers, but also Samsung Pro (NVMe, SATA, even microSD), Kingston enterprise (DC500M/DC600M/DC1500M, NVMe, SD/microSD), even some Seagate Nytro SATA/SAS enterprise drives, Crucial MX500, WD Red, and a bunch of other brands.

    I’m a data hoarder organizer for family/relatives/friends I regularly give tech support for and myself. I love to recycle old PC I’ve build previously into NAS, media center, NVR or whatever new projects or ideas they come up with.

    Unfortunately, I may have missed out on some great DDR4 and DDR5 deals I saw but was thinking it was not immediately necessary 🫤… oh well… we win some and lose some.

  • leanleft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    i wouldnt mind to snag a deal on some premium ddr3. but if they raise the price, then nvm. i’ll wait till next year.