• designatedhacker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Notably, Google, Bing, and DuckDuckGo all have the same problems, and in many cases, Google performed better than Bing and DuckDuckGo by the researchers’ measures.”

    Click bait headline. I see they’re good at SEO themselves.

    • Sippy Cup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, DDG skips all the sponsored links but I generally find what I’m looking for faster on Google if I just skip half the page rather than trying to find the right incantation to bring up what I’m looking for on DDG.

      • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve tried, many times over the years, to use DDG and you are 100% spot-on. I find it damn-near impossible to find what I need without some deep voodoo magic to somehow craft the perfect query. It’s been a decade+ since I’ve gone to page 2 of a Google search. Using DDG I can be 3 or 4 pages deep before maybe finding the answer. There is SOOO much irrelevant stuff to filter through.

        It sucks, I don’t want to use Google, but there doesn’t seem to be a great alternative.

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Care to share what kind of stuff you look for? Usually, when I look for niche media or code stuff, either I find it effectively enough on DuckDuckGo, or it’s not on Google at all, full stop.

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I swear I’m going to capture screenshots of 2-3 dozen searches across DDG & Google, as well as hopefully Bing, Startpage… SearXNG…

            b/c DDG is doodoo while corporate overlord Google is great with Ublock Origin.

            Faithfully perform every search on DDG first in the hopes I can keep the data out of Google’s hands! But !g out half the time.

            Anybody know of a site, app, or TamperMonkey script that’ll search multiple search engines side-by-side?

            In the meantime, one example w/a direct quote from deep inside a Harry Potter book:

            • LWD@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Genuinely, thank you for going through the trouble. I know it’s a huge ask, especially because it’s not easy to retroactively remember a specific type of search you were struggling with on one engine versus the other.

              *Insert joke about how Google is the woke search engine here*

              • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not entirely true, they have their own index they use to augment/modify the results with. Like the paper linked in this very post shows, actually.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, kagi is great. I too got frustrated with the shittiness of DDG and others like ecosia. Paying for a search engine sounds crazy but I’m not going back. Google’s results are absolutely terrible compared to kagi so 🤷‍♀️

        • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          just use a !g if you don’t get what you want the first time on ddg and you’ll still get a proxied google search result.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Would you be able to give an example of what you couldn’t find with DDG that was simpler to find with the help of Google? Sounds interesting to me, as I use DDG pretty much exclusively.

        • Sippy Cup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t remember the specific case, most of the things I Google are local businesses. I find for local businesses Google is a top tier resource. Google can tell me how busy a business is right now, or if they’re closed because of the weather. I often have to do some digging to find the business’ page on DDG, if they have one. If I’m looking for a local contractor, like a water heater or drywall repair guy, the ads aren’t even that intrusive, they’re literally what I’m looking for. On DDG, I’ve got to do some clicking to find a contractor and then all the reviews are on Yelp. General contractors will have a list sometimes on DDG, but it’s not all that helpful, I’ve never seen a phone number without clicking once or twice.

          • LWD@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Makes sense. After all, Google has Maps to request specific data from people, and it stalks your location at all times to help figure out when places are busy.

            • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              But on the flipside, if that data were publically owned and anonymized I’d genuinely want that kept. Since the feature is super useful. Same with busses and so on.

              • LWD@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s an interesting flipside. Considering we’re basically facing the same dilemma with OpenAI scraping the entire Internet now, except this time around they didn’t even do it with our presumed consent.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I honestly think there’s something wrong with Google’s individual customization. They’re leaning in a little too hard on things you’re likely to be searching for rather than what you’re actually searching for.

      DDG gives me better results for random searches on things I’m not usually looking for. When I was looking for Godot exercises yesterday every hit on DuckDuckGo for ages was just exactly what I wanted. When I went over to search Google there was a lot of more varied topics. Now, hands down if I need what time a certain store closes at a certain location Google will give me exactly what I’m looking for. Likewise if I need to know what’s near something else Google is absolutely superior to DDG. Google’s image search is also far more accurate and useful.

      But then I come back and look for a medical condition for my cat that I’ve never heard of before, You passed by the sponsors and they’ve got a couple of random pages about it maybe a Reddit article or two that’s now blocked, but it quickly devolves to adjacent searches.

      But if I go and search for any of my usual suspects, The rankings come back pretty decent.

      • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve run into that, I recently started playing The Finals (which I recommend), and Google searches have a hard time not changing my searches to American football, even if I put “video game” in the search

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, the paper shows a startling lead for Google, more than I would have expected.

      I try to swap to DDG every so often (usually once a year, giving it about a month), but every time search ends up being frustrating enough so I don’t stick around. Nevermind their boneheaded decision of using Apple Maps over something that actually wants to be useful like OpenStreetMap. But what I didn’t expect was just how big the difference between the two is when analyzed, damn.