• EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d say more likely it’s labs, hospitals, and other scientific stuff where you have to deal with old instruments cause lack of money. I’m fairly certain the military uses some other OS, I believe NATO uses Solaris for example.

      • minyakcurry@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 months ago

        Also that machine only works under very specific circumstances, so you fear changing anything in case your entire protocol breaks and you have to start from scratch.

      • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        “Windows for Submarines”

        It’s XP for Vanguard subs. I really hope none of them provide any telemetry for these stats though.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        As a former banker I can tell you that most ATMs run Windows NT 4.0.

        However since the network is completely clamped down and the OS boots via network as well (no hard drives in ATMs), they are pretty secure.

        I’ve also indeed seen some Windows XP terminals in use just lately - one in fact in a hospital my current company collaborates with - but it’s isolated and used to run some sequencer that was never ported to a 64 bit architecture, and apparently doesn’t run in compatibility mode either.

      • Trollception@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve seen Citrix used a lot in hospitals to host apps. Xp isn’t used any longer since it’s not supported.

    • Deiv@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I highly doubt it. I work for a large bank, and it’s all W10/11 due to the need for continuous security patches/currency updates. Large banks don’t mess around with EOL software that has a risk of vulnerabilities

      • AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Large banks don’t mess around with EOL software that has a risk of vulnerabilities

        Well, more complex modern software has an higher risk of (yet unknown) vulnerabilities.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Mainstream support ended 15 years ago. Extended security support ended 10 years ago. The last version to have any kind of update at all was their embedded OS version for things like cash registers, with the last security update 5 years ago.

        So it’s wildly insecure against any new attacks targeting an OS that’s largely used by major corporations, governments, and medical facilities that are juicy targets for theft and ransomware attacks.

        • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          There is a service called 0patch that offers live microcode updates for XP. They’ve even won bounties for a few things they caught before Microsoft.

          I pay about $30 a year to live micropatch my WIn7 gaming partition and have had no issues despite also being a bit less than diligent when it comes to digital buccaneering on that machine.