The information would probably be delivered raw into our minds. We’d just know what time it is, what the weather will be, who’s calling us and what the news are saying, without having to process the information.

  • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have aphantasia, so I’m curious what the experience would be like for that as well.

    Like if the whole thing is designed to evoke mental imagery rather than actual sight, what happens to those who don’t have that ability?

    • DarkMetatron@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe we aphantisians will get a version with mental voice narration instead of mental images, much like visual blind people have today for visual media and information.

        • DarkMetatron@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It could create a really bad loop of the inner monologue and the implant voice interacting and discussing with each other.

      • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe, but if it’s designed for a brain that works “normally”, the way a thought “works” (or is served up) might be incompatible.

        For example, consider the prevalence of the phrase “close your eyes and picture X”, particularly in meditation and other relaxation techniques. I am incapable of doing this exercise (and for most of my life I was very confused by the phrase). Most people, from what I’ve been able to gather, are incapable of imagining a world without that inner picture, so why would they make the interface work for that deficit?