• kibiz0r@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    We have a mechanism for people to make their work publically visible while reserving certain rights for themselves.

    Are you saying that creators cannot (or ought not be able to) reserve the right to ML training for themselves? What if they want to selectively permit that right to FOSS or non-profits?

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Essentially yes. There isn’t a happy solution where FOSS gets the best images and remains competitive. The amount of data needed is outside what can be donated. Any open source work will be so low in quality as to be unusable.

      It also won’t be up to them. The platforms where the images are posted will be selling and brokering. No individual is getting a call unless they are a household name.

      None of the artists are getting paid either way so yeah, I’m thinking of society in general first.