• Montagge@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Can someone please show me these ads for snaps? I’ve been using Ubuntu for almost 4 years and I’ve never seen an ad for anything.

      • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        They don’t really asvertise snaps in the OS per say, but they do push users to use snaps instead of .deb packages. Why? My best guess is they wanna monopozie the portable app market (Snaps, Flatpak, AppImage) and become sort of like what systemd is now - unreasonable to ask to use anything else but systemd.

        Pro features ads are right there when you do apt update or apt upgrade (can’t remember which one of these, maybe both).

        • pythonoob@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          So you’re saying the crime is that developers… Want people to use the software they created?

          ???

          • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            There is no crime. I just don’t like pushy messages or suggestions. I like using native packages. I don’t like using Snaps/Flatpaks/AppImages. Stop suggesting me to use them!

        • Montagge@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Is it an ad or is it just letting you know about a feature you can use? I don’t personally consider that an ad.

          Unpopular opinion I prefer snaps over flatpak. At least when I update snaps I actually know how much is going to be downloaded lol

          • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            They forced Firefox’s default package into a snap recently. They did this without integrating with Gnome or common plugins like password managers. This of course broke a ton of shit out of the blue.

            Then, to get Firefox off of snap, you have to do a non zero amount of config instead of giving the users a simple option at install. If you mess that config up at all, the next Firefox update just goes back to snap.

            Forcing people’s primary application into an Canonical controlled packaging system is likely worse than an ad, honestly. It made it very clear to me that Ubuntu did not respect user choice like it used to, so i migrated off of it.

              • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I bounced around to Debain and opensuse tumbleweed, but landed on pop-os. Ubuntu without snap nonsense, optional i3 tiling manager implementation, “just works.”

                For the server side, ive moved to Debian. Nothing lost at all.

          • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Well, yeah. It’s not actually an add, but it does say that there are pro features available (can’t remember exactly what it said). It’s just pushy, not something I’d expect to see in a Linux distro.

            I don’t like either, I always use native pacakges. I repackage what is not available for the distro I currently use. It’s just simpler IMO. One pacakge manager, all apps are available system wide, so if I decide to switch accounts or someone else might wanna use my computer/laptop, no prob, just log in as Guest, do whatever, log out.

    • WelcomeBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Is this also true for headless servers? I’ve been using Ubuntu via SSH for 15 years now and it’s always been fine for me but I’ve also never run the desktop version (for more than a few days anyway.)

      I just installed it on a scavenged workstation last month to use as a media server and I didn’t notice anything unusual.

      Edit:

      While we’re at it, what does the hive mind think I should be using instead for turning old trash PCs into shitty servers? The only thing Lemmy has taught me so far is that Ubuntu sucks and the only truly honorable choice is to quit my job and stop speaking to my family so that I can devote my life to installing drivers on unstable Arch. Also, I’m supposed to buy some thigh-high stockings and learn to tuck apparently?

      • SteveTech@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I usually use Debian for servers, which would be fine for you because Ubuntu is(was?) based on it, so it’s still got apt and some other similarities.

      • OR3X@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I use Debian headless for my media server and mint cinnamon on the desktop. I don’t care for anything vaguely Gnome 3.

      • mihnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Mint or Pop!_OS I think is the current popular non-shitty entry level OSes.

      • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        While we’re at it, what does the hive mind think I should be using instead for turning old trash PCs into shitty servers?

        Void. The speed difference is unmeasurable, especially when using old equipment. Plus it still supports x86. If you’re used to the terminal, you won’t notice a difference, trust me… except a lot more speed and less RAM usage.

        The only thing Lemmy has taught me so far is that Ubuntu sucks and the only truly honorable choice is to quit my job and stop speaking to my family so that I can devote my life to installing drivers on unstable Arch.

        Everything works pretty much out of the box in Void. Hardware doesn’t work? Try installing some of the firmware binary blobs (firmware-intel, firmware-broadcom, etc.). Check the hardware manufacturer and model with lspci or lsusb (depending on how the hardware is connected to the PC). 99% of the time, the thing works after firmware packages are installed 👍.

        Also, I’m supposed to buy some thigh-high stockings and learn to tuck apparently?

        No, just be open minded to new things and have a reddit account for asking questions/getting support… cuz the Void team didn’t join the protest and their subreddit is still the official help forum for Void.